Kitab-Kitab Syarah Sunan Al-Nasa'i: Satu Tinjauan Metodologi Berdasarkan Teori Ilmu Syarh Al-Hadith
Commentaries on Sunan Al-Nasa’i: A Methodological Review Based on the Theory of Syarh Al-Hadith
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2025.26.1.898Keywords:
Sunan al-Nasa'i, Syarh al-hadith, Metodologi, Analisis perbandinganAbstract
Sunan al-Nasā’ī merupakan salah satu karya utama dalam Kutub al-Sittah yang mendapat perhatian meluas dalam kalangan ulama hadith, termasuk melalui penghasilan pelbagai karya syarah. Namun, kajian terhadap metodologi yang digunakan dalam kitab-kitab syarah Sunan al-Nasā’ī masih kurang diberikan perhatian secara khusus dalam disiplin ilmu syarḥ al-ḥadīth. Justeru itu, kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengisi kekosongan tersebut dengan meneliti pendekatan metodologi yang digunakan oleh tiga buah kitab syarah terpilih terhadap Sunan al-Nasā’ī, iaitu Dakhīrah al-‘Uqbā, Hāsyiah al-Sindī dan Hāsyiah al-Suyūṭī. Penyelidikan ini menumpukan kepada mengenal pasti persamaan dan perbezaan dalam kaedah pensyarahan mereka serta bagaimana metodologi tersebut mempengaruhi pemahaman dan penghuraian hadith berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip ilmu syarḥ al-ḥadīth. Pendekatan kualitatif digunakan dalam kajian ini, dengan kaedah analisis dokumen sebagai teknik pengumpulan data utama serta analisis kandungan sebagai teknik analisis data. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa terdapat kepelbagaian pendekatan dalam ketiga-tiga kitab syarah yang dikaji, mencerminkan kerencaman perspektif ilmiah dalam tafsiran hadith. Kajian ini menyumbang kepada perluasan wacana ilmu syarh al-hadīth dengan menekankan kepentingan memahami pendekatan metodologi secara kritis. Oleh itu, dicadangkan agar kajian lanjutan dilakukan terhadap kitab-kitab syarah hadith yang lain bagi memperkukuh kefahaman terhadap tradisi pensyarahan hadith dalam khazanah keilmuan Islam.
Sunan al-Nasā’ī is one of the primary works within the Kutub al-Sittah and has received significant scholarly attention, particularly through various commentaries. However, the methodological approaches employed in the commentaries on Sunan al-Nasā’ī have not been extensively examined within the discipline of syarḥ al-ḥadīth. This study seeks to address this gap by exploring the methodological approaches used in three selected commentaries on Sunan al-Nasā’ī: Dakhīrah al-‘Uqbā, Hāsyiah al-Sindī, and Hāshiyah al-Suyūṭī. The research focuses on identifying the similarities and differences in their interpretive methods, and how these methodologies influence the understanding and elaboration of hadith based on the principles of syarḥ al-ḥadīth. This study adopts a qualitative approach, employing document analysis as the main data collection method, and content analysis as the method of data analysis. The findings reveal a range of methodological diversity among the three commentaries, reflecting a variety of scholarly perspectives in hadith interpretation. This study contributes to the broader discourse of hadith methodology by emphasizing the importance of critically understanding different methodological approaches. It is recommended that future research explore the methodologies of other hadith commentaries to further enrich the understanding of hadith commentary traditions in Islamic scholarship.
References
Aida Hartini Nan, Siti Fazidatul Zahariah Mat Saleh, Sakinah Abdul Mokti, Saadiah Mohd, & Sharifah Nurulhuda S Ab Latif. (2024). Pengaplikasian kaedah hadis tematik dalam pembinaan isi kandungan risalah dakwah: the application of the thematic hadith method in the construction of da’wah messages. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 14(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT122024-14.
Amir Nabil dan Tasnim Abdul Rahman. (2021). Perkembangan ilmu syarah hadith: Suatu telaah ringkas. Rusydiah Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 2(2), 1-26 https://doi.org/10.35961/rsd.v2i2.291
Anwar, S., Malik, D. A., Zulvia, R. A. ., Fauziansah, S. ., Fitrianto, B. ., & Anwar, S. . (2024). Ahl al-hadith and ahl ar-ra’yi in the formation and development of Islamic law. International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS), 3(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v3i2.88.
Al-‘Ani, Umar ‘Abd al-‘Aziz. (2007). Adwa’ ‘ala al-Manhaj al-Fiqhi fi Sharh al-Hadith. Dalam Mu’tamar ‘Alami ‘an Manahij Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim wa Sharh al-Hadith al-Sharif, Vol. 3. h. 1231–1264.
Al-Ashrafi, H. ‘A. ‘A. S. (2007). Al-Sharh al-Mawdu‘i li al-Hadith al-Sharif: Dirasah Nazariyah Tatbiqiyah (Tesis Sarjana). Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia.
Arsyad, J. ., Yuslem, N. ., & Sakinah, A. . (2023). Relevansi metode pendidikan Islam dalam kitab Hadis al-Arba’in an-Nawawī dengan metode pendidikan masa kini. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i1.332.
Bayānūnī, F. D. (t.th.). Ḥammiyyatu al-shurūḥ al-ḥadīth wa-qawāʿiduhā. Dalam Mu’tamar ‘Alami ‘an Manahij Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim wa Sharh al-Hadith al-Sharif. Jil. 2, h. 945–976).
Brinkmann, S. (2023). Between Philology and Hadith Criticism: The Genre of Sharḥ Gharīb al-Ḥadīth. Dalam. J. Blecher & S. Brinkmann (pnylgr.), Hadith Commentary: Continuity and Change (pp. 15–49). Chapter, Edinburgh University Press.
Croker, Robert A. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. Australia: Springer.
Dzulfaidhi H. D. (2024). Kitab al-‘Ilal al-Saghīr sebagai karya ‘ilal al-hadīth: suatu analisis perbandingan. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari. 25(1), 38-49.
Faisal A. S. (2011). Pendekatan Kontekstual dalam Memahami Hadith-Hadith Rasulullah SAW. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari. 4(7),101-120
Fath al-Din, M., & Abdul Manas, S. (2022). ‘Ulūm Dirāyat Matn al-Hadīth. Selangor: IIUM Press.
Al-Hākim. (1937). Maʿrifah ʿUlūm al-Hadīth. Kaherah: Dār al-Kutub al-Misriyyah.
Hamzani I. et. al. (2021). Pengetahuan dan pemahaman pelajar Institut Kemahiran Islam Malaysia Sarawak (Ikmas) mengenai asas ilmu hadis. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari. 22(3): 195-210.
Ibn Sidah, ‘A. I. (1999). Al-Muḥkam wa al-Muḥīṭ al-Aʿẓam fī al-Lughah. Jil. 4. M. al-Saqqa dan H. Nassar. (pnylg.). Mesir: Ma‘had al-Makhtutat bi Jami‘at al-Duwal al-‘Arabiyah.
Khalīlī, K. A. (1989). Al-Irsyād fī Maʿrifah ʿUlamā al-Hadīth. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd.
Mahdī Jamil. (2023). Al-Madkhal Sunan al-Imām al-Nasā’ī al-Mujtabā. Kuwait: Idārah al-Syu’ūn al-Fanniyah.
Mohd Awang Idris, Haslina Muhamad dan R Zirwatul Aida R Ibrahim. (2018). Metodologi Penyelidikan Sains Sosial. Kuala Lumpur: UM Press.
Muhammad bin ‘Alawi. (2003). Al-Qawāʿīd al-Asāsiyah fī ʿIlm Muṣṭalaḥ al-Ḥadīth. Kaherah: Dār al-Hāwi.
Muhammad bin Umar Bazmūl. (2009). ʿIlmu Syarḥ al-Ḥadīth wa Rawāfid al-Baḥth ‘anhu. Arab Saudi: Markaz Buḥūth al-Dirāsāt al-Islāmiyyah.
Munāwī, A. (2016). Al-Tawqīf ʿalā Muhimmāt al-Ta‘ārīf. Kaherah: Ālam al-Kutub.
Nur Muhammad Anas Razak dan Mohd Arif Nazri. (2024). Manhaj kritik matan hadis Ibn al-Qayyim: Kajian terhadap kitab al-Manār al-Munīf. Jurnal Pengajian Islam, 17(2),140-152
Al-Qinnawji, S. b. H. (1999). Abjad al-ʿUlūm al-Musammā bi al-Washy al-Marqūm fī Bayān Ahwāl al-‘Ulūm. Jil. 2. ‘A. al-J. Zakkar. (pnylg.). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Safdi, B. K. (2015). Ilmu Syarah Hadith: Dirasah Ta’siliyah Manhajiyyah. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Islam Ghaza.
Al-Sakhāwī. (1993). Bughyah al-Rāghib al-Mutamannī fī Khatm al-Nasā’ī. Riyadh: Maktabah Obekan.
Al-Samʿānī, Abdul Karim Abdul Rahman (1988). Al-Ansāb. Beirut: Dār al-Jinān.
Al-Syanqīṭī, Mukhtar. (2004). Syurūq Anwār al-Minan al-Kubrā al-Ilāhiyyah bi Kashf Asrār al-Sunan al-Ṣughrā al-Nasā’iyyah. Riyadh: Maṭba‘ah al-Ḥumaidi.
Al-Zahabī, M. A. (1985). Siyar A‘lām al-Nubalā’. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-09-22 (2)
- 2025-07-16 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in JIMK journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
