Review of Islamic Law Against Execution of Collateral Auctions on Islamic Banking Institutions in Aceh, Indonesia
Abstract
This article review Islamic law quoted from jurists’ opinion and legal experts on the use of auction trading theory in the collateral sale. Every financial transaction in Islamic banking required a guarantee. It is intended to save bank funds if the customer defaults. Based on constitutional act Number 4 of 1996 of mortgage rights, Islamic banks have the right to confiscate the asset (guarantees) of a customer who has reached the due date without intention to pay. However, the bank cannot carry out unilateral execution to make direct sales. The formal procedures which banks must follow to disburse funds from customer guarantees are usually long and often meet various obstacles. This article analyzes normatively and empirically the bail auction guarantees implementation on Islamic banking in Aceh based on the Islamic law concept from the al Quran, Hadith, and the scholars’ Ijma’. Although conventional law is still used in the auction rules, the implementation of guarantees as applied to Islamic banking has adopted many Islamic laws. However, in the practice, there are still many problems that arise from the Islamic law scope which uphold the philosophy of maslahah and the concept of justice. The paper, therefore, employs qualitative approach and secondary date to investigate Shariah perspective against execution of collateral auctions on Islamic banking institutions in Aceh, Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. (2010). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditia Bhakti.
AbdulGaniyy, A., & AbdulKareem, I. A. (2020). Islamic Banking and Global Financial Crises: A Review of Liquidity Risk Management. Islam Universalia, International Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Sciences 2(1), 153-170.
Adamu, I. Y. (2018). Idea of Collateral and Guarantor in Islamic Bank Financing. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 1(5), 49-57.
Ahmad, A. (2004). Fikih Lelang Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif. Jakarta: Kiswah.
Ali, H. Z., & Nu'man, B. (2008). Hukum gadai syariah. Sinar Grafika.
Andara, D., Dewi, I. K., & Ramadhan, F. M. (2020). Legal Protection of Customers in Credit Agreements with Collateral of Land Rights. In 1st Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities, Economics and Social Sciences (BIS-HESS 2019) (pp. 1061-1066). Atlantis Press.
Anwar, M., Yaswirman, Y., & Ulfanora, U. (2019). Dispute Resolution of Shariah Economy in Murahabah Financing Contract in Sahabat Mitra Sejati Cooperatives. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(3), 72-78.
Az-zuhaili, W. (2011). Al-Fiqh Al-Islami wa Adillatuhu. Jakarta: Gema Insani dan Darul Fikr.
Baidhawy, Z. (2012). Distributive principles of economic justice: an Islamic perspective. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 2(2), 241-266.
Biereenu-Nnabugwu, M. (2006). Methodology of Political Inquiry: Issues and Techniques of Research methods in Political Science. Enugu: Quintagon Publishers
Dahlan, A. R. (2010). Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Amzah.
Disemadi, H. S. (2019). Risk Management In The Provision Of People’s Business Credit As Implementation Of Prudential Principles. Diponegoro Law Review, 4(2), 194-208.
Effendi, P. (1994). Peraturan Lelang. Jakarta: Esa Study Club.
Errico, L., & Sundararajan, V. (2002). Islamic financial institutions and products in the global financial system: Key issues in risk management and challenges ahead. International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper
Fadhli, M. (2018). Tinjauan hukum islam terhadap eksekusi lelang jaminan pada institusi perbankan syariah di Febrianto, S., & Ayunda, S. D. (2020). The Implementation of Execution Auction by Creditors on Debtor Rights Guarantee in the Office of State Assets and Auction Services (KPKNL) in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(5), 104-122.aceh. At-tasyri', 39-50.
Harahap, M. Y. (2005). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidan Perdata (kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ibnu Rusyd. (1992). Bidayatul Mujtahid Juz II. Lebanon: Beirut.
Kodithuwakku, S. (2015). Impact of credit risk management on the performance of commercial banks in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology, 2(7), 1-6.
Nurul Musjtari, D., Riyanto, B., & Setyowati, R. F. (2018). Parate Execution in Disputes Settlement of Financing Contract with Mortgage Guaranteed On Islamic Banking Practices. E&ES, 175(1), 012187.
Patrik, P. (2006). Hukum Jaminan, Edisi Revisi dengan UUHT (Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan). Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Monica, A., & Djaja, B. (2020). Legal Consequences of Auction of Mortgage Right With Lower Limit Value Than the Value of Property Appraisal by the Appraisal Team (Study of Jakarta High Court Decision Number 516/PDT/2017/PT. DKI). In The 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020) (pp. 165-170). Atlantis Press.
Muljadi, K., & Widjaja, G. (2007). Seri Hukum Harta Kekayaan: Hak Istimewa. Gadai, dan Hipotek, Kencana, Jakarta.
Sofi, S. A., & Nika, F. A. (2016). Concepts of social justice: An Islamic perspective. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(4), 19-31.
Solihah, C., Widjajaatmadja, D. A. R., & Husaeni, U. A. (2019). The Element of" Injustice" in The Process of Executing The Auction of Collateral Items From The Murabaha Financing Contract at Shariah Commercial Bank. Justicia Islamica, 16(2), 343-366.
Suyatno, T. (1999). Kelembagaan Perbankan. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Trisna, Y. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Eksekusi hak Tanggungan (studi kasus perkara perdata no. 38/pdt. G/2012/pn. Pbr) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Andalas).
Copyright (c) 2021 The Journal of Management Theory and Practice (JMTP)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.