POWER AND SOLIDARITY IN POSITIVE FACEBOOK POSTINGS AMIDST COVID-19 IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol5iss2pp329-364Abstract
Background and Purpose: Coronavirus has posed an unfamiliar threat to the world. Despite such circumstances, Malaysians continue to stay optimistic by keeping abreast with updates and mostly by seeking refuge in hopeful and consoling messages shared by fellow citizens. This study identified Facebook postings with positive messages, posted by Malaysians during the Movement Control Order (MCO) implemented by the Malaysian government as a form of prosocial behaviour.
Methodology: Through an analytic framework consisting of Positive Discourse Analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis, 15 Facebook postings related to COVID-19 were selected and identified as positive discourse, which were coded and categorised using a thematic analysis. Further analysis was also conducted on the linguistic features identified in the narratives of the postings showing the construction of positive discourse in the Facebook postings.
Findings: The findings demonstrate an extensive utilisation of expressions of solidarity primarily through collective pronouns like “we” and “us”, which suggest solidarity and empowerment among Malaysians in dealing with COVID-19. Further analysis reveals the forms and contextual functions of the linguistic strategies as carrying pragmatic devices (e.g. speech acts and figurative language), which contributes to the power enactment in the Facebook postings in creating an overall positive reaction.
Contributions: This critical discourse study does not only promote positive discourse for its own sake, but also serves as a pragmatic approach to materialise utilitarian goals. It is therefore hoped to contribute not only to linguistics, but also social, psychological as well as arts and humanities studies through further examinations of the pivotal roles that communication and language play, especially in rising against dire situations.
Keywords: COVID-19, Critical Discourse Analysis, media discourse, Positive Discourse Analysis, power and solidarity.
Cite as: Azizan, M., Ismail, H. H., & Qaiwer, S. N. (2020). Power and solidarity in positive Facebook postings amidst COVID-19 in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 5(2), 329-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol5iss2pp329-364
References
Agustin, O. (2012). Enhancing solidarity: Discourses of voluntary organizations on immigration and integration in multicultural societies. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 7(1), 81-97.
Alhabash, S., & McAlister, A. R. (2015). Redefining virality in less broad strokes: Predicting viral behavioral intentions from motivations and uses of Facebook and Twitter. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1317–1339.
Alon, I. (2020). COVID-19 and International Business: A viewpoint. FIIB Business Review, 1(1), 1-3.
Applaud Handling of Covid-19. (2020, February 25). Experts applaud handling of Covid-19 outbreak. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/regional/2020/02/25/experts-applaud-handling-of-covid-19-outbreak
Arumugam, T. (2020, April 4). MCO-linked domestic violence rises. News Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/news/exclusive/2020/04/581233/mco-linked-domestic-violence-rises
Bar-Tal, D., & Raviv, A. (2013). A cognitive-learning model of helping behaviour development: Possible implications and applications. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behaviour (pp. 199-215). Academic Press.
Barclay, P., & van Vugt, M. (2015). The evolutionary psychology of human prosociality: Adaptation byproducts, and mistakes. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 37-60). Oxford University Press.
Bartlett, T. (2009). Towards intervention in positive discourse analysis. In C. Coffin, T. Lillis, & K. A. O’Halloran (Eds.), Applied linguistics and (con)text: Systemic functional linguistics, critical discourse analysis and ethnography (pp. 133-147). Routledge.
Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behaviour. In T. Millon, M. J. Lerner & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 463-483). John Wiley & Sons.
Bellah, R. (2005). Durkheim and ritual. In J. C. Alexander & P. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Durkheim (pp. 183-185). Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. Sage.
Bouvier, G. (2012). How Facebook users select identity categories for self-presentation. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 7(1), 37-57.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bulbulia, J., & Mahoney, A. (2008). Religious solidarity: The hand grenade experiment. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8(3-4), 295-320.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press.
Damian, E., & Van Ingen, E. (2014). How does SNS usage affect the personal networks of migrants? Societies 4(4), 640–653.
De Fina, A. (2003). Identity in narrative: A study of immigrant discourse (Vol. 3). John Benjamins.
Delang, L., & Neyts, J. (2020). Medical treatment options for COVID-19. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, 9(3), 209-214.
Duncan, L. E. (2012). The psychology of collective action. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 885-908). Oxford University Press.
Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of the religious life. Dover Publications, Inc.
Eghdam, A., Hamidi, U., Bartfai, A., & Koch, S. (2018). Facebook as communication support for persons with potential mild acquired cognitive impairment: A content and social network analysis study. PloS One, 13(1), e0191878.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2007). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: social, emotional and personality development (Vol. 3) (pp. 646-649). John Wiley & Sons.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), discourse as social interaction (pp. 258-284). Sage.
Farhud, A. (2016). Social media, its positive and negative implications on society. Anthropology and Sociology, 5(2), 71-75.
Flowerdew, L. (2004). The argument for using English specialised corporato understand academic and professional language. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 489–511.
Franz, D., Marsh, H. E., Chen, J. I., & Teo, A. R. (2019). Using Facebook for qualitative research: A brief primer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(8), 1-12.
Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 153-171.
Grint, K. (2020). Leadership, management and command in the time of the Coronavirus. Leadership, 0(0), 1-6.
Grubic, N., Badovinac, S., & Johri, A. M. (2020). Student mental health in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for further research and immediate solutions. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1(1), 1-2.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Harris, J. (2020, March 22). Facebook is still far too powerful. It’s also how millions are coping with the crisis. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/22/facebook-powerful-crisis-coronavirus-communities-online
Herder, J. G. (2002). Letters for the advancement of humanity (1793–7) – Tenth Collection. In M. N. Foster (Ed.), Philosophical writings (pp. 380-382). Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, J. M. F. (2018). Progressing positive discourse analysis and/in critical discourse studies: Reconstructing resistance through progressive discourse analysis. Review of Communication, 18(3), 193-211.
Kwok, L., & Yu, B. (2013). Spreading social media messages on Facebook: An analysis of restaurant business-to-consumer communications. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(1), 84–94.
Laitinen, A., & Pessi, A. B. (2015). An introduction. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice (pp. 1-29). Lexington Books.
Lazarus, R. S. (2001). Relational meaning and discrete emotions. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 37–67). Oxford University Press.
Macgilchrist, F. (2007). Positive discourse analysis: Contesting dominant discourses by reframing the issues. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 1(1), 74-94.
Martin, J. R. (2002). Blessed are the peacemakers: Reconciliation and evaluation. In P. Coppock (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 187-227). University of Hong Kong Press.
Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de estudios Ingleses. 49(1), 179-200.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.
Pasquel, F. J., & Umpierrez, G. E. (2020). Individualizing inpatient diabetes management during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 1(1), 1-3.
Rains, S. A., & Young, V. (2009). A meta-analysis of research on formal computer-mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35(3), 309–336.
Redekop, C. (1967). Toward an understanding of religion and social solidarity. Sociological Analysis, 28(3), 149-161.
Rickman, E. (2019). Multifaceted religion and its relationship with violent attitudes and behaviours. (Unpublished master dissertation). Texas Tech University.
Rossolatos, G. (2014). Conducting multimodal rhetorical analysis of TV ads with Atlas.ti 7. Multimodal Communication, 3(1), 51-84.
Salmela, M. (2015). Collective emotions as ‘the glue’ of group solidarity. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice (pp. 55-87). Lexington Books.
Soffer, O. (2013). The internet and national solidarity: A theoretical analysis. Communication Theory, 23(1), 48-66.
Stibbe, A. (2017). Positive discourse analysis: Re-thinking human ecological relationships. In A. F. Fill & H. Penz (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics (pp. 165–178). Routledge.
Su, T. (2016). Positive discourse analysis of XI Jinping’s speech at the National University of Singapore under appraisal theory. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 796-801.
Thomas, E. F., Cary, N., Smith, L. G. E, Spears, R., & McGarty, C. (2018). The role of social media in shaping solidarity and compassion fade: How the death of a child turned apathy into action but distress took away. New Media & Society. 20(10), 3778-3798.
Van Ingen, E., Utz, S., & Toepoel, V. (2015). Online coping after negative life events: Measurement, prevalence, and relation with internet activities and well-being. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 1-19.
Viney, L. L., & Bousfield, L. (1991). Narrative analysis: A method of psychological research for AIDS-affected people. Social Science & Medicine, 32(7), 757–765.
Walton, M., Murray, W., & Christian, M. D. (2020). Mental health care for medical staff and affiliated healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, 9(3), 241–247.
Weber, M. (1922). 1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
Zahn-Waxler, C., & Radke-Yarrow, M. (2013). The development of altruism: Alternative research strategies. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behaviour (pp. 109-136). Academic Press.
