Physics in integrated STEM education research projects: A systematic review in the secondary school context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss1pp64-82Abstract
Background and Purpose: This review explores the integration of physics into STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education through project-based learning (PjBL) at the secondary school level. It aims to identify common types of integrated STEM projects for physics students and the physics concepts most frequently employed, addressing current gaps in the field.
Methodology: Guided by the PRISMA framework, this systematic review analyzed 20 peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last five years and indexed in the Scopus database.
Findings: The analysis revealed four main categories of physics-based STEM projects: Inquiry-Based Learning with Technology, Engineering Design Challenge Products, Electronic Module (E-module) Projects, and Abstract Problem-Solving Activities. Physics concepts related to momentum and Newtonian mechanics were most dominant, while thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, electronics, optics, and wave theory were underrepresented. Significant gaps identified include limited interdisciplinary integration, uneven physics content distribution, and inadequate resource availability.
Contributions: In response to these findings, a "5-Way Forward" framework is proposed to enhance the quality and impact of STEM project implementation in physics education. This review offers valuable insights for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers to improve physics engagement in integrated STEM education and suggests directions for future research on long-term impact and teacher training.
Keywords: integrated STEM project, physics project, STEM education, physics education, secondary school.
Cite as: Nassiri, S. H., Khamis, N., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2026). Physics in integrated STEM education research projects: A systematic review in the secondary school context. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 11(1), 64-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss1pp64-82
References
Andrews, T. C., Speer, N. M., & Shultz, G. V. (2022). Building bridges: A review and synthesis of research on teaching knowledge for undergraduate instruction in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(66), 1-21.
Asrizal, A., Mardian, V., Novitra, F., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Physics electronic teaching material-integrated STEM education to promote 21st-century skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 17(8), 2899-2914.
Bao, T. Q., Khoa, C. T., Ngoc, N. T., Ha, N. T. T., Hoan, V. Q., Quang, P. H., & Ha, C. V. (2019). Electromagnetic induction phenomena integrated Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education in Vietnamese high schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1), Article 012031.
Chen, Y., & Chang, C. C. (2018). The impact of an integrated robotics STEM course with a sailboat topic on high school students' perceptions of integrative STEM, interest, and career orientation. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), 1-16.
Chomphuphra, P., Chaipidech, P., & Yuenyong, C. (2019). Trends and research issues of STEM education: A review of academic publications from 2007 to 2017. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1), Article 012069.
Costa, M. C., Ferreira, C. A. F., & Pinho, H. J. O. (2023). Physics of sound to raise awareness for sustainable development goals in the context of STEM hands-on activities. Sustainability, 15(4), Article 3676.
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), Article 4.
De Meester, J., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Buyse, M.-P., Ceuppens, S., De Cock, M., De Loof, H., Goovaerts, L., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Struyf, A., Thibaut, L., Van de Velde, D., Peter Van, P., & Dehaene, W. (2020). Bridging the gap between secondary and higher STEM education – The case of STEM@school. European Review, 28(S1), S135-S157.
Dedetürk, A., Kirmizigül, A. S., & Kaya, H. (2021). The effects of STEM activities on 6th grade students' conceptual development of sound. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 21-37.
Dewi, F. H., Samsudin, A., & Nugraha, M. G. (2019). An investigation of students' conceptual understanding levels on fluid dynamics using four-tier test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5), Article 052037.
Dominguez, A., De la Garza, J., Quezada-Espinoza, M., & Zavala, G. (2024). Integration of Physics and Mathematics in STEM education: Use of modeling. Education Sciences, 14(1), 1-16.
Dvorak, J. S., Franke-Dvorak, T. S., & Neel, S. (2016). Using Wii technology and experiential learning to teach Newtonian Mechanics to rural middle school students. Journal of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 59(2), 387-395.
Goovaerts, L., De Cock, M., Struyven, K., & Dehaene, W. (2018). Developing a module to teach thermodynamics in an integrated way to 16 year old pupils. European Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-11.
Guzey, S. S., & Li, W. (2023). Engagement and science achievement in the context of integrated STEM education: A longitudinal study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(2), 168-180.
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2016). Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher-developed engineering design-based STEM integration curricular materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 6(1), 1–19.
Hambali, M. A., Mohd Adam, H. A., Jamiaan, M., & Shamsuddin, N. (2024). CSR-driven STEM education: Case study on PolyDuino Arduino kits implementation in secondary schools, Kedah. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3S), 1073-1085.
Handayani, E. S., Yuberti, Saregar, A., & Wildaniati, Y. (2021). Development of STEM-integrated physics e-module to train critical thinking skills: The perspective of preservice teachers. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1796, Article 012100.
Henrich, V. E. (2018). Motivating non-science majors: The technology of electromagnetic waves. Physics Teacher, 56(1), 29-31.
Hojjat, A. R., & Keshtkar, M. M. (2025). A thermodynamic evaluation of a multi-objective system optimized using integrated Pinch and exergy analysis. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1-31.
Ismail, I., Anuar, N., Ali, F. Z., Syed Zainal Ariffin, S. M. Z., & Mohd Idris, N. (2025). Attitude and perception towards microcontroller education among rural area students in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 38(1), 1–11.
Ismail, M. H., Fadzil, H. M., & Salleh, M. F. (2024). Science teachers’ instructional practices: A need analysis for preparing integrated STEM practices through scientist-teacher-student partnership. Asian Journal of University Education, 20, 630-642.
Kanyesigye, S. T., Uwamahoro, J., & Kemeza, I. (2022). The effect of professional training on in-service secondary school physics' teachers' motivation to use problem-based learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21, 272-288.
Khanaposhtani, M. G., Liu, C. J., Gottesman, B. L., Shepardson, D., & Pijanowski, B. (2018). Evidence that an informal environmental summer camp can contribute to the construction of the conceptual understanding and situational interest of STEM in middle-school youth. International Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 1-23.
Kotsis, K. T. (2024). The importance of teaching electromagnetic radiation interaction in high schools. Journal of Science Education Research, 8(2), 142-151.
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2017). Teaching quantum mechanics in high school. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), Article 010109.
McLure, F. L., Tang, K.-S., & Williams, P. J. (2022). What do integrated STEM projects look like in middle school and high school clasroom? A systematic literature review of empirical studies of iSTEM projects. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(73), 1-15.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6(7), e1000097.
Mørch, A. I., Flø, E. E., Litherland, K. T., & Andersen, R. (2023). Makerspace activities in a school setting: Top-down and bottom-up approaches for teachers to leverage pupils' making in science education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 39, Article 100697.
Nassiri, S. H. (2012). Kajian kes terhadap amalan Pengetahuan Teknologi Pedagogi dan Kandungan (PTPK) terhadap guru Fizik Johor Bahru [Unpublished Master’s dissertation]. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 17(28), 1-28.
Parno, L., Yuliati, F. M., Hermanto, & Ali, M. (2020). A case study on comparison of high school students’ scientific literacy competencies domain in physics with different methods: PBL-STEM education, PBL, and conventional learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 159-168.
Poor, S. V., Herman, B. C., & Janney, B. A. (2023). Using video media to teach physics and the nature of science, the clearing house. A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 96(4), 122–129.
Purwaningsih, E., Usdiana, E. N., Yuliati, L., Kurniawan, B. R., & Zahiri, M. A. (2021). Improvement of students’ creative thinking skills in optical subject with STEM worksheets. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(1), Article 050008.
Rahman, N. F. A., Roslan, A. N., Azaha, A. N., & Ismail, N. H. (2021). Informal science pedagogical innovation to promote understanding of technology application in fluids mechanics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(18), 242-255.
Rasheed, G., Khan, M., Malik, N., & Akhunzada, A. (2021). Measuring learnability through virtual reality laboratory application: A user study. Sustainability, 13(19), Article 10812.
Roehrig, G. H., Wang, H.-H., Moore, T. J., & Park, M. S. (2021). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44.
Rugh, M. S., Beyette, D. J., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2021). Using DIME maps and STEM project-based learning to teach physics. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(4), 553–573.
Santos, C., Rybska, E. J., Klichowski, M., Jankowiak, B. A., Jaskulska, S., Domingues, N., Carvalho, D., Rocha, T., Paredes, H., Martins, P., & Rocha, J. (2023). Science education through project-based learning: A case study. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 1713-1720.
Saputri, M., Syukri, M., & Elisa. (2022). Analysis of momentum and impulse on students' creative thinking skill through project-based learning integrated STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2193(1), Article 012066.
Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2020). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 185–212.
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Jourrnal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-12.
Uden, L., Sulaiman, F., Ching, G. S., & Rosales Jr, J. J. (2023). Integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project-based learning for physics learning from neuroscience perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1136246.
Zahara, M., Abdurrahman, A., Herlina, K., Widyanti, R., & Agustiana, L. (2021). Teachers' perceptions of 3D technology-integrated student worksheet on magnetic field material: A preliminary research on augmented reality in STEM learning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1), Article 012083.
Zhao, S., Blaabjerg, F., & Wang, H. (2021). An overview of artificial intelligence applications for power electronics. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 36(4), 4633-4658.
