The ‘will’ behind the ‘skill’: The relationship between attitudes toward computers and computational thinking proficiencies of middle school students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss2pp1-15Abstract
Background and Purpose: Computational thinking (CT) has emerged as a fundamental competence for problem solving in the digital age. However, the development of CT skills is not determined solely by technical exposure to technology; affective factors such as students’ attitudes toward computers may also play a significant role. This study aimed to examine the relationship between middle school students’ computational thinking skills (CTS) and their attitudes toward computers (ATC), while also investigating how these variables differ according to selected demographic and technological factors.
Methodology: The study employed a correlational survey design and was conducted with 439 sixth- and seventh-grade students from five public middle schools in Mersin, Türkiye. Data were collected using the Attitudes Toward Computers Scale and the Computational Thinking Levels Scale. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analysis were utilized for data analysis.
Findings: The findings revealed that gender did not produce a significant difference in CTS; however, male students reported significantly higher ATC scores than female students. Prior coding experience was associated with significantly higher levels of both CTS and ATC. In contrast, smartphone ownership and social media use did not lead to significant differences in either variable. Additionally, students with lower daily internet usage demonstrated significantly higher CTS scores than those with heavier internet use. Correlation analysis indicated a moderate positive relationship between CTS and ATC, suggesting that more positive attitudes toward computers are associated with stronger computational thinking skills.
Contributions: This study makes a significant contribution to the literature by empirically challenging the "digital native" assumption, demonstrating that passive technology access—such as smartphone ownership and heavy internet usage—does not translate into computational proficiency. By establishing a robust link between affective dispositions ("will") and cognitive performance ("skill"), the findings highlight that structured coding experience, rather than mere exposure, is essential for fostering both computational thinking and positive technological attitudes.
Keywords: Computational thinking, computer attitudes, Turkish middle school students, coding experience, digital literacy.
Cite as: Uzun, E., Gök, A., & Yakin, İ. (2026). The ‘will’ behind the ‘skill’: The relationship between attitudes toward computers and computational thinking proficiencies of middle school students. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 11(2), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss2pp1-15
References
Avcu, Y., & Ayverdi, L. (2020). Examination of the computer programming self-efficacy’s prediction towards the computational thinking skills of the gifted and talented students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.2.259
Aybek, E. C. (2012). Kağıt-kalem formu ve bilgisayar ortamında uygulanan genel yetenek testinin psikometrik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması [A comparison of psychometric properties of a general ability test which administered in paper-pencil and computer based form] [Unpublished Master's thesis]. Ankara University, Turkiye.
Aybek, E. C., & Demirtaşlı, R. N. (2014). A comparison of psychometric properties of a general ability test which administered in paper-pencil and computer-based form. Elementary Education Online, 13(4), 1400–1413. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2014.81052
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 349–365). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_20
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Deng, Y., Liu, W., Liu, K., Fang, Y., Shang, J., Zhou, L., Wang, K., Leng, F., Wei, S., Chen, L., & Liu, H. (2020). Clinical characteristics of fatal and recovered cases of Coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective study. Chinese Medical Journal, 133(11), 1261-1267. https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000000824
Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116(1), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Ekinci, M., Saraç Öztop, N., Demir Kaymak, Z., & Canan Güngören, Ö. (2023). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin kodlamaya yönelik tutumları ve bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerileri arasındaki ilişki. Uluslararası Düzce Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 81–90.
Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Gleeson, J., Vancampfort, D., Armitage, C. J., & Sarris, J. (2019). The "online brain": How the internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20617
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 international report. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
Guan, T., Zhang, L., Ji, X., He, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2025). Student characteristics and ICT usage as predictors of computational thinking: An explainable AI approach. Journal of Intelligence, 13(11), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13110145
Günbatar, M. S. (2020). Online flipped classroom in the context of transactional distance and cognitive load: A mixed-methods study. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 9(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.30971/pjdol.v9i1.1401
Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2021). Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education, 118(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.011
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227
Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67(1), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
Koray, A., & Bilgin, E. (2023). The effect of block coding (Scratch) activities integrated into the 5E learning model in science teaching on students’ computational thinking skills and programming self-efficacy. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 18(1), 2825–2845. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.or410
Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the Computational Thinking Scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72(C), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
Lin, S., & Wong, G. K. W. (2024). Gender differences in computational thinking skills among primary and secondary school students: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(7), Article 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070790
Master, A. (2021). Gender stereotypes influence children’s STEM motivation. Child Development Perspectives, 15(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12424
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
Paulus, F. W., Ohmann, S., von Gontard, A., & Popow, C. (2018). Internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 60(7), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13754
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225
Ramazanoğlu, M. (2021). Robotik kodlama uygulamalarının ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilgisayara yönelik tutumlarına ve bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerisine yönelik öz yeterlilik algılarına etkisi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25(1), 163–174.
Reychav, I. & McHaney, R. (2017). The relationship between gender and mobile technology use in collaborative learning settings: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 113(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.005
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72(C), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22(1), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016). Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 19(1), 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002
Sun, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, D. (2022). Programming attitudes predict computational thinking: Analysis of differences in gender and programming experience. Computers & Education, 181(C), Article 104457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104457
Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2023). The effect of scaffolding programming games and attitudes towards programming on the development of computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6845–6867. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10639-022-11465-y
Totan, H. N., & Korucu, A. T. (2023). The effect of block based coding education on the students’ attitudes about the secondary school students’ computational learning skills and coding learning: Blocky sample. Participatory Educational Research, 10(1), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.24.10.1
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12(1), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2022). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72(1), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872
