Design and validation of discrete writing tasks to enhance the writing proficiency of college students in southern Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss2pp262-277Abstract
Background and Purpose: Writing proficiency is a fundamental component of academic success, particularly in higher education. However, many college students continue to struggle with developing effective writing skills. This study aimed to design and validate a set of discrete writing tasks specifically tailored for Filipino college students in Southern Philippines and to evaluate their effectiveness in improving students’ writing proficiency. The study sought to assess the tasks' content validity, examine their clarity and relevance, and measure their impact on student performance.
Methodology: A Design-Based Research (DBR) framework guided the study, comprising two key phases: the Development Phase and the Experimental Phase. In the Development Phase, the discrete writing tasks were subjected to expert validation by five subject matter experts, focusing on quality and clarity. In the Experimental Phase, 30 students were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n=15) or the control group (n=15). Writing proficiency was measured using an essay-type test evaluated with a rubric adapted from the IELTS Writing Test 2023 version. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was used to assess task quality. Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) were calculated, and inferential analyses, including the t-test and Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA), were applied to determine significant differences between groups.
Findings: The discrete-task intervention significantly improved students' writing proficiency. The experimental group achieved "Very Good to Expert Level" post-test mean scores across all dimensions: content (M = 4.77), coherence/cohesion (M = 4.79), lexical resource (M = 4.53), grammatical range (M = 4.23), and mechanics (M = 4.54). Conversely, the control group’s mean scores ranged from 2.62 to 3.69 ("Limited to Modest" and "Competent to Good" levels). While a paired-samples t-test showed significant pretest-to-posttest improvement for the control group (p = .002), an independent-samples t-test revealed a statistically significant difference in gain scores favoring the experimental group, t(28) = 16.345, p < .001. Significant differences spanned all writing sub-skills with large effect sizes (η² > .80), particularly in lexical resource, grammatical range, and mechanics, demonstrating the substantial positive impact of the discrete-task intervention.
Contributions: This study provides empirical evidence supporting the use of discrete, well-designed writing tasks as an instructional strategy for improving college students' writing skills. The validated task set can serve as a pedagogical resource for writing instruction in higher education. Future research may explore the integration of digital platforms to further support task implementation and learner engagement.
Keywords: Discrete tasks, intervention, writing proficiency, writing task validation.
Cite as: Aranego, R. B., Tulud, D. M., Verona, M. O., Gabano-Magbanua, G. B., Dollente, L. A. U., Resurreccion, M. A., De Guzman, E. L. T., Uyangurin, A. B., & Estilloso, E. M. (2026). Design and validation of discrete writing tasks to enhance the writing proficiency of college students in southern Philippines. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 11(2), 262-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss2pp262-277
References
Astuti, W., & Suadiyatno, T. (2021). The effect of picture-cued task towards students’ motivation in learning writing. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 8(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v8i1.3798
Balinbin, A. L. (2020). Filipino students falling behind in reading, writing levels in Southeast Asia. Business World Online. https://www.bworldonline.com/filipino-studentsfalling-behind-in-reading-writing-levels-in-southeastasia
Barrett, C. (2023). The effects of authentic writing on third-grade student motivation and achievement [Published doctoral dissertation]. William Carey University.
Chow, J. Y., Geng, L., Bansal, S., Dickens, B. S. L., Ng, L. C., Hoffmann, A. A., & Lim, J. T. (2024). Evaluating quasi-experimental approaches for estimating epidemiological efficacy of non-randomised field trials: Applications in Wolbachia interventions for dengue. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 24(1), Article 237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02345-9
Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
Dieni, N. A. I. (2022). The use of guided writing to improve students’ writing skill. Proceedings of the International Conference on Linguistics, 2654(1), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220206.024
Dumlao, R. P., & Pinatacan, J. R. (2019). From practice to writing: Using reflective journal instruction in enhancing pre-service teachers’ professional development. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 459-478. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12430a
Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors and suggestions. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.20547/jess0421604201
Gagalang, J. L. (2020). Assessing deficiencies in composition writing: A case of Filipino college freshmen learners. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(1), 307-316.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Education research, an introduction. Longman Publishers.
Gloria, D. S. (2025). Self-regulated learning of alternative learning system senior high school learners in flexible learning modality. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(4), 2359-2367. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i4.22800
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
Gustilo, L. E. (2010). “What you think, feel, and experience shape your writing:” Cognitive, affective, and contextual processes in ESL writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.3860/taper.v19i2.1596
Haidari, S. M., & Uzun, N. B. (2015). Content validity and confirmatory factor analysis of Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (CLAS) for the EFL students. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 5(4), 418–433. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.632336
Hidri, S. (2018). Discrete point and integrative testing. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (1st ed., pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0375.
Hinkel, E. (2010). Integrating the four skills: Current and historical perspectives. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 110–126). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195384253.013.0008
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Llego, M. A. (2022). 21st-century learning: What it is and why it’s important. TeacherPH. https://www.teacherph.com/21st-century-learning/
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting educational design-based research (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105642
Nardo, M. T. B., & Hufana, E. R. (2014). Development and evaluation of modules in technical writing. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(6), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-6-2
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Rais, A., & Syafitri, W. (2021). The effect of discrete-point task towards student writing ability. Journal of English Language and Education, 6(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v6i2.172
Saavedra, A., & Barrientos, C. (2020). Factors that contribute to the poor writing skills in Filipino and English of the elementary pupils. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(5), 971–986.
Santos, D., Sayin, E., & Requero, B. (2024). The impact of individual differences in the holistic-analytic thinking style and product incongruences on word of mouth. International Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 294-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/02134748241249891
Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2020). Design-based research: A methodology to extend and enrich biology education research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), es11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0245
Tok, Ş., & Kandemir, A. (2015). Effects of creative writing activities on students’ achievement in writing, writing dispositions and attitude to English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(1), 1635–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.815
Urago, A. (2016). Challenges of teaching writing skills in EFL classrooms: The case of two preparatory schools in Wolaita Zone [Unpublished Master's thesis]. Institutional Repository of Arba Minch University.
Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1), Article 2061683. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2061683
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A. R. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
