Digital discourse research in linguistics (2010-2025): A bibliometric and content analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss2pp278-305Abstract
Background and Purpose: As digital technologies increasingly reshape language use and social interaction, digital discourse has become a rapidly expanding area of inquiry in linguistics. However, a systematic mapping of its intellectual structure, methodological development, and research coverage remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of digital discourse research in linguistics from 2010 to 2025.
Methodology: A total of 172 peer-reviewed journal articles were retrieved from Scopus and the Web of Science Core Collection through keyword-based searches. After screening based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final dataset was analysed through CiteSpace-based bibliometric analysis and systematic content analysis. The bibliometric analysis examined publication trends, co-cited journals and authors, contributing countries and institutions, and keyword networks, while the content analysis coded discourse types, research methods, analytical tools, and theoretical frameworks.
Findings: The findings show rapid growth after 2020, with Journal of Pragmatics and scholars such as Baker, Androutsopoulos, and Agha occupying central positions. Keyword analysis identifies major themes including corpus-assisted discourse analysis, computer-mediated communication, language and identity, cognitive linguistics, and conversation analysis. The field is dominated by online media discourse, especially social media, while online interactional discourse remains underexplored. Qualitative discourse analysis remains dominant, but corpus-based, computational, and mixed-method approaches have become increasingly visible. Analytical tools are diversified, while theoretical engagement remains uneven, drawing mainly on discourse-analytic, pragmatic, sociolinguistic, cognitive, and multimodal perspectives.
Contributions: This study integrates bibliometric visualization with content coding to clarify the development, knowledge structure, and research gaps of digital discourse studies, offering directions for future interdisciplinary inquiry.
Keywords: Digital discourse, CiteSpace, Bibliometric analysis, Content analysis, computer-mediated communication
Cite as: Liu, Y., Al-Smadi, O. A., Abdullah Kamal, S. S. L., & Zhoub, C. (2026). Digital discourse research in linguistics (2010-2025): A bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 11(2), 278-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss2pp278-305
References
Ab Rashid, R. (2026). Digital discourse studies: Analysing communication in platformed and algorithmic publics. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2026.2671938
Ab Rashid, R., Al-Ramahi, R. A., & Al-Smadi, O. A. (2025a). Trolling in public discourse: Online reactions to Malaysia’s abolishment of examinations. Discourse & Communication, 19(6), 891-910. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813251380469
Ab Rashid, R., Al-Ramahi, R., Harb alQaryouti, M., & Al-Smadi, O. A. (2025b). Figurative language as identity work: A discourse analysis of Syrian refugee narratives. Sage Open, 15(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251395388
Ab Rashid, R., Al Smadi, O. A., & Alqaryouti, M. H. (2025c). Public responses to Malaysia’s exam abolition policy: A metadiscursive analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2025.2587114
Ab Rashid, R, Al‐Smadi, O. A., Al‐Ramahi, R., Alqaryouti, M. H., & Hashmi, U. M. (2025d). A discourse analysis of Syrian refugee learners’ reflective accounts of returning to Syria from Jordan. International Migration, 63(5), e70088. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70088
Ab Rashid, R., Al-Ramahi, R. A., Al-Smadi, O. A., Alqaryouti, M. H., & Sadeq, A. E. (2024a). The identity of a storyteller in teachers’ Facebook status updates. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(11), 3596–3603. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1411.29
Ab Rashid, R., Al-Smadi, O. A., Alqaryouti, M. H., & Sadeq, A. E. (2024b). Malaysian English language teachers’ engagement with instrumental support on Facebook. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(4), 1254-1263. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1504.23
Alkhammash, R. (2023). Bibliometric, network, and thematic mapping analyses of metaphor and discourse in COVID-19 publications from 2020 to 2022. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), Article 1062943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062943
Al-Smadi, O. A., Ab Rashid, R., Al-Ramahi, R. A., Alqaryouti, M. H., Ugli, H. S. Z., & Vokhidovich, A. N. (2025). Jordanian English language learners’ engagement with AI-supported self-regulated learning. Research in Learning Technology, 33(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v33.3377
Al-Smadi, O. A., Ab Rashid, R., Saad, H., & Zrekat, Y. H. (2023). English language teachers’ views of WhatsApp affordances for language learning. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 12(3), 226-237. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v12i3.4858
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking. Discourse, Context & Media, 4–5(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006
Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A. (2020). Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 35(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2021). What gets lost in Twitter “cancel culture” hashtags? Calling out racists reveals some limitations of social justice campaigns. Discourse & Society, 32(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977215
Cantamutto, L., & Delfa, C. V. (2023). Corpus of digital interactions: Systematization of techniques to collect data on WhatsApp. Cuadernos.info, 54(117), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.54.53165
Chen, C. (2016). CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. Nova Science Publishers.
Chen, R., Wang, X., & Zhu, K. (2025). A bibliometric and content analysis of strategy-based instruction and self-regulated learning in second or foreign language teaching from 1994 to 2024. Frontiers in Psychology, 16(1), Article 1474689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1474689
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Duan, C. Y., & Cai, J. D. (2016). Knowledge map research in the field of international ubiquitous learning. Modern Distance Education Research, 1(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575109
Fan, Y. (2022). Analyzing the semiotic nature of GIFs: Visual nominalization and visual telicity. Language and Semiotic Studies, 8(3), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2022-2004
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2013). Statistical methods for rates and propor-tions. John Wiley & Sons.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2017). Small stories research: A narrative paradigm for the analysis of social media. In A. Quan-Haase & L. Sloan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 266–281). SAGE.
Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4(1), 1–37.
Hoffmann, C. R. (2017). Log in: Introducing the pragmatics of social media. In C. R. Hoffmann & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Pragmatics of social media (pp. 1–30). De Gruyter Mouton.
Jones, R. H. (2023). Social media and discourse analysis. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 427–440). Routledge.
Kahn, D. (1996). The codebreakers: The comprehensive history of secret communication from ancient times to the internet. Scribner.
KhosraviNik, M., & Esposito, E. (2018). Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally-mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 14(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0003
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
Lei, R. (2022). On the latest trends in online discourse research from the perspective of interpersonal pragmatics. Modern Foreign Languages (Bimonthly), 45(5), 710-720.
Li, J., & Chen, C. (2022). CiteSpace: Text mining and visualization in scientific literature. Capital University of Economics and Business Press.
Page, R. (2012). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. Routledge.
Page, R., Barton, D., Lee, C., Unger, J. W., & Zappavigna, M. (2022). Researching language and social media: A student guide (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(1) Article 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pascual, D., Mur-Dueñas, P., & Lorés, R. (2020). Looking into international research groups’ digital discursive practices: Criteria and methodological steps taken towards the compilation of the EUROPRO digital corpus. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.08.02.05
Rahman, A., Raj, A., Tomy, P., & Hameed, M. S. (2024). A comprehensive bibliometric and content analysis of artificial intelligence in language learning: Tracing between the years 2017 and 2023. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(4), Article 107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10643-9
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications.
Scott, K. (2022). Pragmatics online (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/b22750
Sha, Y., & Malory, B. (2026). Using ATLAS.ti for constructing and analysing multimodal social media corpora. Linguistics Vanguard, 11(1), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0200
Sun, Y., Wang, G., & Feng, H. (2021). Linguistic studies on social media: A bibliometric analysis. Sage Open, 11(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047572
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 3(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301_7
Wang, G., Wu, X., & Li, Q. (2022). A bibliometric study of news discourse analysis (1988‒2020). Discourse & Communication, 16(1), 110-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211043725
Xiao, H., & Li, L. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of critical discourse analysis and its implications. Discourse & Society, 32(4), 482-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926521992150
Xie, C., Yus, F., & Haberland, H. (2021). Introduction: Approaching internet pragmatics. In C. Xie, F. Yus, & Haberland, H. (Eds.), Approaches to Internet pragmatics (pp. 1-23). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
