Gender communication and marriage law: A socio-cultural analysis of single mothers’ post-divorce experiences in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss2pp380-400Abstract
Background and Purpose: The experiences of single mothers after divorce in Indonesia reflect broader socio-cultural and legal challenges shaped by patriarchal gender norms and weaknesses in marriage law. Single mothers often face stigma, economic vulnerability, and unequal power relations within family and community communication. This study examines their lived experiences through a gender communication perspective, focusing on how cultural norms and legal limitations affect their social position and vulnerability.
Methodology: Using a qualitative approach, this study conducted in-depth interviews with single mothers (n=10) from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds. Data were analysed thematically to explore family communication patterns, coping strategies, and community responses, supported by NVivo software.
Findings: The findings show that patriarchal constructions reinforce stigma and a double caregiving burden, while ineffective enforcement of child support and limited legal protection further weaken single mothers’ socio-economic position and restrict their communicative agency within family and community contexts as well as in everyday social interactions.
Contributions: This study highlights the need for gender-sensitive legal reform and inclusive communication practices to empower single mothers in Indonesia, while also contributing theoretical insights to gender communication and family studies, and offering policy-relevant recommendations for legal and social institutions.
Keywords: Gender communication, single mothers, divorce, Marriage Law, Indonesia.
Cite as: Salisah, N. H., Daud, N., & Hamidah, L. (2026). Gender communication and marriage law: A socio-cultural analysis of single mothers’ post-divorce experiences in Indonesia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 11(2), 380-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol11iss2pp380-400
References
Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666.
Azizah, N. (2022). Komunikasi ibu tunggal dan anak pasca perceraian. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(1), 88–102.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Anchor Books.
BKKBN. (2023). Statistik keluarga Indonesia. Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
Connell, R. W. (2009). Gender: In world perspective. Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226212708.001.0001
Fauzia, N. (2023). Stigma ibu tunggal dalam budaya patriarkal. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 17(1), 45–60.
Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Koerner, A. F. (2004). Family communication schemata: Effects on children’s resilience. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 167–189). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Koerner, A. F. (2005). Family communication patterns theory. Sage.
Galvin, B. M., Randel, A. E., Collins, B. J., & Johnson, R. E. (2018). Changing the focus of locus (of control): A targeted review of the locus of control literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(7), 820-833. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2275
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
Hidayat, T. (2021). Perlindungan hukum perempuan pasca perceraian. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 8(1), 11–25.
Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
KPPA. (2022). Profil perempuan Indonesia. Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak.
Kusumawardani, R. (2020). Perceraian dan kesejahteraan anak. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 145–160.
Lestari, I. (2021). Komunikasi keluarga dan relasi gender. Prenadamedia.
Merry, S. E. (2016). The seductions of quantification. University of Chicago Press.
Munandar, D. (2022). Ketidaksetaraan nafkah pasca perceraian. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 12(2), 87–104.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Pearlin, L. I., Schieman, S., Fazio, E. M., & Meersman, S. C. (2005). Stress, health, and the life course: Some conceptual perspectives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650504600206
Sarat, A., & Kearns, T. R. (1995). Law in everyday life. University of Michigan Press.
Smart, C. (2002). Feminism and the power of law. Routledge.
Suryakusuma, J. (2011). State ibuism: The social construction of womanhood in new order Indonesia. Komunitas Bambu.
United Nations. (2021). Women and family law. United Nations Publications.
Wardani, S., & Pratiwi, D. (2022). Ibu tunggal dan stigma sosial. Jurnal Gender dan Sosial, 6(3), 201–215.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
Wood, J. T. (2015). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
