STATISTICAL THINKING FRAMEWORKS AND MODELS COMPARATIVE STUDY IN GLOBAL MODELS (أطر ونماذج التفكير الإحصائي دراسة مقارنة في النماذج العالمية )

Ashraf Mohamed Nemrawi, Nashaat Abdelaziz Abdelqader Baioumy


The current study aims to trace and analyze statistical thinking frameworks of various types in terms of their origin, types, dimensions, tasks, skills focused on them, hierarchy and sequence of levels, their theoretical and educational reference, The use of technology in its construction and the possibility of integration between all different statistical thinking frameworks or the construction of new frameworks. It relied on the inductive method in the survey of literature, studies and scientific reports that monitored the frameworks of statistical thinking. It also adopted the descriptive approach in analyzing and concluding the relationship between different statistical thinking frameworks Comparing and categorizing them , The most important results of the study that emerged from the frameworks of statistical thinking is different from the educational, statistical or commercial, etc., and most of the frameworks are one-dimensional and a few of them are two-dimensional, and the majority focused on the use of practical issues or tasks to reveal the levels of statistical thinking of learners, Computational thinking within the framework of statistical thinking, he study concluded several conclusions and recommendations. The most prominent of these was that the recent statistical thinking frameworks did not receive such global attention, despite their importance. However, the study recommended the need to increase attention to the frameworks of statistical thinking by developing them and to find a mechanism for integration among them or to build new statistical thinking frameworks.

Full Text:



Ben-Zvi, D., & Friedlander, A. (1997). Statistical thinking in a technological environment. In J. Garfield and G. Burrill (Eds.), Research on the role of technology in teaching and learning statistics (pp. 45-55). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

Ben-Zvi, D., & Makar, K. (2016). The teaching and learning of statistics. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Box, G. (1979). Some problems of statistics and everyday life. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(365), 1-4.

Brown, M. (1998). The paradigm of modeling by iterative conceptualization in mathematics education research. In A. Sierpinska and J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity, Vol. 2 (pp.263-276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Chance, B. L. (2002). Components of statistical thinking and implications for instruction and assessment. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 1-17.

Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5-43.

Fischbein, E. (1987). Mathematics education library. Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D Reidel Publishing Co.

Fitzallen, N. (2012). Reasoning about covariation with Tinkerplots. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Tasmania, Australia.

Garfield, J. (2002). The challenge of developing statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3),

Garfield, J. (2003). Assessing statistical reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(1), 22-38.

Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2005, May). A framework for teaching and assessing reasoning about variability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 92–99. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from ∼iase/serj/SERJ4(1) Garfield BenZvi.pdf 125.

Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning. Connecting Research and Teaching Practice. the Netherlands: Springer.

Hoerl, R.W., & Snee, R.D. (2001). Statistical thinking: Improving business performance. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.

Hogg, B. Garfield, J. Schau, C. and whittinghill, D (2000). Best Practices in 36) introductory statistics, from education/pdfs/usei_l st.pdf.

John, J. A., Whitaker, D., and Johnson, D. G. (2001). Statistical Thinking For Managers. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.A .

Jones, Graham A.; Thornton, Carol A.; Langrall, Cynthia W.; Mooney, Edward S.; Perry, Bob; Putt, Ian J… (2000). A Framework for Characterizing Children's Statistical Thinking. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, Vol. 2, Issue 4. p269, 39p, (AN 4802565).

Kugler, C. Hagen, J. & Singer, F. (2003). "Teaching statistical thinking". Journal of College Science Teaching. 32 (7). 434-439.

Langrall, Cynthia W and Mooney, Edward S. (2002). The Development Of A Framework Characterizing Middle School Students' Statistical Thinking. ICOTS6.

Makar, Katie; Rubin, Andee (2009). A Framework for Thinking about Informal Statistical Inference, Statistics Education Research Journal, v8 n1 p82-105 May.

Minium, Edward W. (1979). Statistical Reasoning In Psychology And Education, (2nd), Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc., U.S.A.

Mooney, E. Hofbauer, P. Langrall, C. & Johnson, Y. (2001). Refining a Framework on Middle School Students Statistical Thinking. A Paper presented in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (23rd. Snowbird. Utah. October 18-21. 2001).

Mooney, Edward S. (2002) A Framework for Characterizing Middle School Students' Statistical Thinking. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p23.

Mooney, Edward S., Hofbauer,Pamela S., Langrall, Cynthia W., and Johnson, Yolanda A. (2001). Refinig A Framework On Middle School Students Statistical Thinking. ERIC #:(ED476626).

National Council Of Teachers Of Mathematiics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va: NCTM.

National Council Of Teachers Of Mathematiics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va: NCTM.

Sabbag, A., & Zieffler A. (2015). Assessing Learning Outcomes: An analysis of the GOALS-2 instrument. Statistics Education Research Journal, 14(2), 93–116.

Snee, R. (1999). Discussion: Development and use of statistical thinking: A new era. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 255-258.

Vallecillos, A. & Moreno, A. (2002). ."Framework for Instruction and Assessment on Elementary Inferential Statistics Thinking, 2nd International Conference. Crete. Greece.

Vandenbroeck, Philippe & Wouters, Luc & Molenberghs, Geert & Van Gestel, Jef & Bijnens, Luc. (2006). Teaching Statistical Thinking to Life Scientists a Case-Based Approach. Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics. 16. 61-75.

Webester, s. (1976). Third New International Dictionary, Spring Field Massachuchs, U.S.A.

Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry (with discussion). International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223-265.

Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., delmas, R., & Reading, C. (2008). A framework to support research on informal inferential reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 40-58.


  • There are currently no refbacks.