A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE AND THE LAW OF QISAS

Authors

  • Ridoan Karim PhD Researcher, Faculty of Law, University of Malaya
  • Shah Newaz Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Jalan Universiti, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Ahmed Imran Kabir Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Jalan Universiti, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss2pp169-177

Abstract

Discussion on penology generally revolves around the philosophy behind the ‘punishment’ and its ‘implementation’ in order to maintain a crime-free, harmonious society. To understand the philosophy of the major school of thoughts for punishment, this paper discusses the theory of retributivism as a punishment mechanism and relates it to Qisas - the theory of punishment that hinges on Islamic criminal law jurisprudence. The objective of this paper is to compare the retributive concept of punishment with the Islamic theory of Qisas and to unravel how Islam attempts to establish justice through punishment while implementing forgiveness. It is significant to note that we can find a nexus between the retributive and Qisas school of theory that perpetrators should be punished as a consequence of the crime or an act that is against norms of the community. Nonetheless, this paper concludes that Qisas is quite distinct from the concept of retributivism in the case of punishment. Whereas the core of the retributive justice system is to put the moral blame on the offender for the offence and to provide justice through similar punishment; the law of Qisas is more concerned with the fairness and forgivingness.

Keywords: Forgiveness, Islamic criminal law, punishment, retributive justice, Qisas

Cite as: Karim, R., Newaz, S., & Kabir, A.I. (2017). A comparative analysis of retributive justice and the law of qisas. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 2(2), 169-177.  http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss2pp169-177


References

Al-Qur’an.

Andrews, E. (2013). 8 things you may not know about Hammurabi’s Code. Retrieved from http://www.history.com/news/history-lists/8-things-you-may-not-know-about-hammurabis-code

Barker, E. (2012). The political thought of Plato and Aristotle. Massachusetts: Courier Corporation.

Bedau, H.A. (2001). Feinberg's liberal theory of punishment. Buffalo criminal law review, 5(1), 103-144.

Blake, M. (2001). Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy & public affairs, 30(3), 257-296.

Cardozo, B.N. & Kaufman, A.L. (2010). The nature of the judicial process. London: Quid Pro Books.

Collison, M. (1993). Punishing drugs: Criminal justice and drug use. The British Journal of Criminology, 33(3), 382-399.

Cottingham, J. (1979). Varieties of retribution. The Philosophical Quarterly, 29(116), 238-246.

Cunneen, C., Baldry, E., Brown, D., Brown, M., Schwartz, M., & Steel, A. (2016). Penal culture and hyperincarceration: The revival of the prison. London: Routledge.

Davis, A.Y. (2011). Abolition democracy: Beyond empire, prisons, and torture. New York: Seven Stories Press.

Djait, H. (1985). Europe and Islam. California, U.S.: University of California Press.

Doi, A.R.I. & Clarke, A. (2008). Shariah: Islamic law. West Norwood: Ta-Ha Publishers.

Ezorsky, G. (2015). Philosophical perspectives on punishment. Albany, New York: Suny Press.

Fuller, G. & Kurpershoek, M. (2013). What future for political Islam. Netherlands: WRR.

Hakeem, F.B., Haberfeld, M.R., & Verma, A. (2012). Policing Muslim communities: Comparative international context. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Hascall, S.C. (2011). Restorative justice in Islam: Should Qisas be considered a form of restorative justice? Berkeley Journal of Middle Eastern & Islamic Law, 4(1), 35-78.

Jervis, L.A. (2015). Divine retribution in Romans. Interpretation, 69(3), 323-337.

Peters, R. (2005). Crime and punishment in Islamic law: Theory and practice from the sixteenth to the twenty-first century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Posner, R.A. (1980). Retribution and related concepts of punishment. The Journal of Legal Studies, 9(1), 71-92.

Prince, J.D. (1904). The code of Hammurabi. The American Journal of Theology, 8(3), 601-609.

Quinton, A.M. (1954). On punishment. Analysis, 14(6), 133-142.

Roth, M.P. (2014). An eye for an eye: A global history of crime and punishment. London: Reaktion Books.

Roy, J.G. (1989). Prisons and society: A study of the Indian jail system. New Delhi, Delhi: Gyan Publishing House.

Ruthven, M. (2012). Islam: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rychlak, R.J. (1990). Society's moral right to punish: A further exploration of the denunciation theory of punishment. Tulane Law Review, 65(2), 299-341.

Schirazi, A. (1997). The constitution of Iran: Politics and the state in the Islamic republic. Iranian Studies, 37(3), 517-520.

Sigler, M. (2010). Private prisons, public functions, and the meaning of punishment. Florida State University Law Review, 38(1), 149-178.

Simon, R.J. & Blaskovich, D.A. (2007). A comparative analysis of capital punishment: Statutes, policies, frequencies, and public attitudes the world over. Maryland, U.S.: Lexington Books.

Warren, C.S. (2010). Islamic criminal law: Oxford bibliographies online research guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wasti, T. (2006). Islamic Law in practice: The application of Qisas and Diyat Law in Pakistan. Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law Online, 13(1), 97-106.

Wasti, T. (2008). The application of Islamic criminal law in Pakistan: Sharia in practice. Boston: Brill.

Wheeler, M.E. (1972). Toward a theory of limited punishment II: The Eighth Amendment after Furman v. Georgia. Stanford Law Review, 25(1), 62-83.

Williams, R. (2008). Civil and religious law in England: A religious perspective. Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 10(3), 262-282.

Wilson, J. (1983). The purposes of retribution. Philosophy, 58(226), 521-527.

Wymer, R. (1986). Suicide and despair in the Jacobean drama. Sussex: Harvester Press.

Zaibert, L. (2016). Punishment and retribution. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE AND THE LAW OF QISAS. (2017). Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 2(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss2pp169-177