THE METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS OF READING STRATEGIES IN THAI EFL LEARNERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss2pp1-14Abstract
This paper explores the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and the use of reading strategies among Thai EFL learners. Fifteen female university students who are in their fourth-year undergraduate study of English at a Thai university participated in this study. The study used a mixed-method approach. The Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) was used to investigate the participants’ metacognitive awareness involved in reading. Also, to insightfully assess and analyze the participants’ reading strategies while they were reading the academic texts, a think-aloud protocol was used. The findings reveal that the participants’ overall use of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies (Global, Problem-solving, and Support reading strategies) was at a high level (Mean = 2.85, S.D. = 0.31). Among 30 individual reading strategies, the most frequently used was underlining and circling (Mean = 3.60, S.D. = 0.74), which fall under Support Reading Strategy (SUP). On the other hand, it can be seen that the least frequently used reading strategy was asking self-questions (Mean = 1.93, S.D. = 0.70), under the category of SUP strategies. When considering the appropriate and effective use of metacognitive reading strategies in the think aloud protocol by the participants in successful reading comprehension, it is discovered that using background knowledge, previewing text, reading slowly and carefully, pausing to reflect on reading, taking notes while reading, and summarizing were frequently used the students.
Keywords: EFL learners, metacognitive, reading strategies, think aloud, Thailand.
Cite as: Chutichaiwirath, K. & Sitthitikul, P. (2017). The metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in Thai EFL learners. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 2(2), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss2pp1-14
References
Baker, L. & Brown, A. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. New York, NY: Long- Man.
Boyraz, S. & Altinsoy, E. (2017). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in EFL context. International Journal of Language Academy, 5(5), 159-167.
Carrell, P.L., Pharis, B.G., & Liberto, J.C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.
Chawwang, N. (2008). An investigation of English reading problems of Thai 12th-Grade students in Nakhonratchasima educational regions 1, 2, 3, and 7. (Unpublished master thesis). Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chamot, A.U. (2009). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach, second edition. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education/Longman.
Chamot, A.U. & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annuals, 22(1), 13-24.
Creswell, J.W. & Clark, V.P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Erler, L. & Finkbeiner, C. (2007). A review of reading strategies: Focus on the impact of first language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Griffith, P.L. & Ruan, J. (2005). What is metacognition and what should be its roles in literacy instruction? Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hong-nam, K. & Page, L. (2014). Investigating metacognition awareness and reading strategy use of EFL Korean University students. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 195-220.
Ismail, N.M. & Tawalbeh, I. (2015). Effectiveness of a metacognitive reading strategies program for improving low achieving EFL readers. International Education Studies, 8(1), 71-87.
Iwai, Y. (2016). Promoting strategic readers: Insights of preservice teachers’ understanding of metacognitive reading strategies. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 1-10.
Jahandar, S., Khodabandehlou, M., Seyedi, G., Mousavi, R., & Abadi, D. (2012). The think-aloud method in EFL reading comprehension. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 3(9), 1-9.
Kummin, S.A. & Rahman, S. (2010). The relationship between the use of metacognitive strategies and achievement in English. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 7(C), 145-150.
Lin, L.C. & Yu, W.Y. (2015). A think-aloud study of strategy use by EFL college readers reading Chinese and English texts. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 286-306.
Mokhtari, K. & Reichard, C.A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
Murtagh, L. (1989). Reading in a second language or foreign language: Models, processes, and pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2(2), 91-105.
Panchu, P., Bahuleyan, B., & Seethalakshmi, K. (2016). The role of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies as a predictor of academic achievement. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4(11), 720-725.
Pei, L. (2014). Does metacognitive strategy instruction indeed improve Chinese EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(5), 1147-1152.
Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53(4), 649-702.
Samuels, S.J., Ediger, K.M., Willcutt, J.R., & Palumbo, T.J. (2005). Role of automaticity in metacognition and literacy instruction. Abingdon: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Saricoban, A. & Behjoo, B.M. (2017). Metacognitive awareness of Turkish EFL learners on reading strategies. Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 21(1), 159-172.
Sharpe, P. (2011). Practice exercises for the TOEFL: 7th edition. Hauppauge: Barrons Educational Series Inc., U.S.
Sheorey, R. & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native speakers. System, 29(4), 431-449.
Sinthopruangchai, S. (2011). A study of Thai EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. (Unpublished master thesis). Language Institute, Thammasat University Bangkok, Thailand.
Tavakoli, H. (2014). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy awareness in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian University EFL students. The Reading Matrix, 14(2), 314-336.
Wang, Y. (2016). Reading strategy use and comprehension performance of more successful and less successful readers: A think-aloud study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(5), 1789-1813.
Yayli, D. (2010). A think-aloud study: Cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies of ELT department students. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 38(10), 234-251.
Yoshida, M. (2008). Think-aloud protocols and type of reading task: The issue of reactivity in L2 reading research. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
