THE FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ CHOICE IN STUDYING ENGLISH AT PRIVATE TUTORING SCHOOLS: A CASE OF THAI UPPER-SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss2pp44-52Abstract
This study explores the factors leading Thai upper-secondary school students to study English at tutoring school. The students’ perceptions of their EFL private tutors and mainstream school teachers are also a focus of this research. Drawing on statistical data from 80 upper-secondary school students, it shows that these students perceive EFL private tutors to be more effective in the provision of examination support, particularly regarding the university admission examination, compared with mainstream school teachers. Overall, these students have more positive attitudes towards their English tutors than their mainstream school teachers. They agree that tutors have higher English language proficiency and can make them understand the lesson better than their school teachers. The characteristic of the tutors and teaching techniques is considered a significant factor leading students to study English at tutoring schools, particularly the teaching techniques that allow them to do better on university examinations. These findings not only highlight the impact of private tutoring schools on language education systems, but also caution Thai educational policy makers and practitioners to further explore the pressure of the university admission examination on upper-secondary school students in the country.
Keywords: Examination support, English language proficiency, private tutoring schools, teaching technique, Thailand.
Cite as: Chan, C. & Mongkolhutthi, P. (2017). The factors affecting students’ choice in studying English at private tutoring schools: A case of Thai upper-secondary school students. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 2(2), 44-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss2pp44-52
References
Bray, M., Hallak, J., & Caillods, F. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Paris: Unesco, International Institute for Educational Planning.
Chung, I. (2013). Crammed to learn English: What are learners’ motivation and approach? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 585-592.
Ho, A.H., Chui, C.H., & Borschel, M. (2017). Understanding and managing youth and elderly suicide in developed East Asia. New York, USA: Routledge.
Jheng, Y.J. (2015). The influence of private tutoring on middle-class students’ use of in-class time in formal schools in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 40(1), 1-8.
Lester, D. (2013). Measuring Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Psychological Reports, 113(1), 15-17.
Liem, A., Onggowijoyo, R.B., Santoso, E., Kurniastuti, I., & Yuniarti, K.W. (2015). Exploring stressful live events on Indonesian adolescents. In The 10th Asian Association of Social Psychology Biennial Conference, Universitas Gadjah Mada. (pp. 75-95). Yogyakarta: Center for Indigenous and Cultural Psychology.
Lowe, R.J. (2015). Cram schools in Japan: The need for research. Readers’ Forum, 39(1), 26-31.
Manzo, K.K. (2002). Japanese schoolchildren “cram” to boost achievement. Education Week, 21(43), 1-8.
Manzoor, S. (2013). Reasons and necessity of private tutoring in English for Bangla medium primary school students in Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: BRAC University.
Napompech, K. (2011). What factors influence high school students in choosing cram school in Thailand? Retrieved from http://www.ipedr.com/vol16/17-ICBER2011-A20009.pdf
Nath, S.R. (2006). Private supplementary tutoring among primary students in Bangladesh. Educational Studies, 34(1), 55-72.
Research Center, Kasikorn. (2015). K-research. Retrieved from https://www.kasikornresearch.com/en/keconanalysis/pages/ViewSummary.aspx?docid=33790
Wei, H.S. & Chen, J.K. (2014). Filicide-suicide ideation among Taiwanese parents with school-aged children: Prevalence and associated factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(3), 468-478.
Wijetunge, D.B. (1994). Management of acute and traumatic wounds: main aspects of care in adults and children. The American Journal of Surgery, 167(1), S56-S60.
