UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION

Jalaluddin Abdul Malek, Sengboon Lim, Zurinah Tahir

Abstract

Citizen participation is a much contested and conflicting term, whereby the general consensus highlighted its value for a democratic society. However, various complex issues regarding its understanding and implementation from power holders and citizens alike are abundant in practice. Therefore, this paper aims to make sense of the issues of citizen participation from the perspective of different stakeholders, such as power holders and have-not citizens. Purposive sampling on 45 informants was utilized in this study to facilitate a qualitative research design using in-depth interviews. Meanwhile, open and axial coding allowed the formation of themes regarding the understanding on the specific phenomenon of citizen participation in city programs conducted by the local authorities of the state of Selangor, Malaysia. The themes that surfaced as issues included the dependency on government resources, mismatch of interest, organized and collective citizen force, and life cycle approach and realistic volunteerism. This study contributed to the enrichment of knowledge on citizen participation issues, clarifying for citizens and power holders alike in fostering genuine participation that truly benefited all. Additionally, it underlined findings fundamental for further academic quantitative participation research.

 

Keywords: Citizens’ dependency, conflicting needs, organized and collective opinion, power distribution, realistic volunteerism.

Cite as: Abdul Malek, J., Lim, S., & Tahir, Z. (2019). Understanding the issues of citizen participation.  Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp1-22

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.

Bason, C. (2013). Engaging citizens in policy innovation: Benefiting public policy from the design inputs of citizens and stakeholders as ‘experts.’ In Lindquist et al. (Ed.), Putting citizens first: Engagement in policy and service delivery for the 21st century. Canberra: ANU Press.

Baum, F. E., Bush, R. A., Modra, C. C., Murray, C. J., Cox, E. M., Alexander, K. M., & Potter, R. C. (2000). Epidemiology of participation: An australian community study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54(6), 414-423.

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.

Boyte, H. C. (2018). How Americans can reweave our fraying social fabric. Retrieved from https://www.minnpost.com/community-voices/2018/11/how-americans-can-reweave-our-fraying-social-fabric/

Brande, L. V. D. (2017). Reaching out to EU citizens: A new opportunity. Luxembourg: European Union.

Brody, S. D. (2003). Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plan based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management.

Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(1), 407-419.

Bruno, E. (2015). Co-deciding with citizens: Towards digital democracy at EU level. Brussels: European Commission.

Burnard, P. (2004). Writing a qualitative research report. Nurse Education Today, 24(1), 174-179.

Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen participation: Models and methods. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(11), 1179-1196.

Capra, C. F. (2014). The smart city and its citizens: Governance and citizen participation in Amsterdam Smart City. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.

Cohen, J. & Uphoff, N. (1980). Participation’s place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity. World Development, 8(1), 213-235.

Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking “participation”: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269-283.

Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Davies, A. & Simon, J. (2013). The value and role of citizen engagement in social innovation. Brussels: The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe (TEPSIE).

Davies, A., Simon, J., Patrick, R., & Norman, W. (2012). Mapping citizen engagement in the process of social innovation. Brussels: European Commission.

Elias, M. V. & Alkadry, M. G. (2011). Constructive conflict, participation, and shared governance. Administration and Society, 43(8), 869-895.

European Union, EU. (2016). Sustainable development in the European Union: A statistical glance from the viewpoint of the sustainable development goals. Luxembour: European Union.

European Union, EU. (2017). Sustainable development in the European Union: Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context. Luxembourg: European Union.

Forest, P. G. (2013). “Citizens as analysts” redux: Revisiting Aaron Wildavsky on public participation. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(1), 1-13.

Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 66-75.

Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513-522.

Gibson, C. M. (2006). Citizens at the center: A new approach to civic engagement. New York: The Case Foundation.

Holgersson, J. & Karlsson, F. (2014). Public e-service development: Understanding citizens’ conditions for participation. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 396-410.

Huggins, M. (2012). Community visioning and engagement: Refreshing and sustaining implementation. National Civic Review, 101(3), 3-11.

International Association for Public Participation, IAP2. (2018). Advancing the practice of public participation. Retrieved from https://www.iap2.org/default.aspx%0AAdvancing

Irvin, R. A. & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65.

Kawulich, B. B. & Holland, L. (2012). Qualitative data analysis. In Wagner et al (Ed.), Doing social research: A global context (pp. 228-245). London: McGraw-Hill.

Kirby, S. & McKenna, K. (1989). Experience, research, social change: Methods from the Margins. Toronto: Garamond Press.

Lee, L. T. (2010, May 12). Get citizens to participate in urban governance. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2010/05/12/get-citizens-to-participate-in-urban-governance/

Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

Mariana, M. O. (2008). Stakeholder participation in the implementation of Local Agenda 21 in Malaysia. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Marrone, M., & Hammerle, M. (2018). Smart cities: A review and analysis of stakeholders’ literature. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(3), 197-213.

Merriam, S. B. & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mohammadi, S. H., Norazizan, S., & Nikkhah, H. A. (2018). Conflicting perceptions on participation between citizens and members of local government. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1761-1778.

Morris, A. (2015). A practical introduction to in-depth interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Oakley, P. (1991). Project with people: The practice of participation in rural development. Geneva: International Labour Office, ILO.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD. (2001). Citizens as partners: OECD handbook on information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. (Marc Gramberger, Ed.) (Vol. 20). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD. (2010). Transparency through consultation and communication. In Better Regulation in Europe: Finland (pp. 71-82). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Pateman, C. (2003). Participation and democratic theory. In R. Dahl, I. Shapiro, & J. A. Cheibub (Eds.), The democracy sourcebook (pp. 40-47). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rosener, J. B. (1978). Citizen participation: Can we measure its effectiveness? Public Administration Review, 38(5), 457-463.

Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

Silverman, R. M. (2005). Caught in the middle: Community Development Corporations (CDCs) and the conflict between grassroots and instrumental forms of citizen participation. Journal of the Community Development Society, 36(2), 35-51.

Simonofski, A., Asensio, E. S., De Smedt, J., & Snoeck, M. (2017). Citizen participation in smart cities: Evaluation framework proposal. In Proceedings of IEEE 19th CBI, Thessaloniki, Greece, 24-17 July (pp. 227-236). Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society.

United Cities and Local Governments, UCLG. (2016). Executive summary of co-creating the urban future: the agenda of metropolises, cities and territories (Vol. Gold IV). Barcelona: United Cities and Local Governments.

Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527-540.

White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6-15.

Wilcox, D. (1994). The guide to effiective participation. Brighton: Delta Press.

Willems, J., Bergh, J. V., & Viaene, S. (2017). Smart city projects and citizen participation: The case of London. In R. Andeßner (Ed.), Public sector management in a globalized world (pp. 249-266). Berlin: Springer.

World Bank. (1996). The World Bank participation sourcebook. Washing DC: The World Bank.

World Bank. (2014). Strategic framework for mainstreaming citizen engagement in World Bank Group operations. Washingto DC: The World Bank.

WUF9. (2018). WUF9 program at a glance. Retrieved from http://wuf9.org/programme/

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.