CONNECTING MULTILITERACIES AND WRITING PEDAGOGY FOR 21ST CENTURY ENGLISH LANGUAGE CLASSROOMS: KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR TEACHER EDUCATION IN SINGAPORE AND BEYOND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol5iss2pp192-214Abstract
Background and Purpose: Given the dynamic, global and multimodal character of English in the 21st century, it should be reasonable to expect English language (EL) teaching to accommodate the influences of media and technology on modern communication practices. In Singapore, education policy therefore highlights multiliteracies as one of three foci for the EL classroom. Yet, scant attention has been paid in research and practice to the impact of technology-mediated communication on writing pedagogy. This paper presents the findings of an extensive multiple-case study research project which sought to establish how multiliteracies pedagogy was being utilized in Singaporean secondary teachers’ classrooms and the significant internal and external factors that contributed to classroom practice.
Methodology: The research explored six EL teachers’ practices within one unit of work, focusing on writing skills. Data were gathered through video recorded lesson observations, pre- and post-lesson interviews to explore rationales and justifications for planning and implementation, and focus group discussions to establish common practices, values and beliefs towards writing pedagogy.
Findings: The study found that although teachers were aware of and trained in multiliteracy practices, they dominantly addressed writing as a monomodal form of communication, limited student autonomy and critical development, and neglected culture in their instruction.
Contributions: We argue that writing instruction must be socially situated and multimodal and teacher education must prepare practitioners to empower learners to become critical and effective writers. We also assert that examination-oriented practices make writing in the classroom inauthentic and largely incomprehensible, despite belief that the opposite is true.
Keywords: Language teacher education, literacy, multiliteracies, multimodality, writing.
Cite as: Mizusawa, K., & Kiss, T. (2020). Connecting multiliteracies and writing pedagogy for 21st century English Language classrooms: Key considerations for teacher education in Singapore and beyond. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 5(2), 192-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol5iss2pp192-214
References
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
Biggs, J. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: A role for summative assessment? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 103-110.
Brugar, K. A. (2018). Learning and teaching in a visual world: Elementary teacher candidates’ use of visual materials. Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue, 20(1-2), 1-14.
Bull, G., & Anstey, M. (2010). Evolving pedagogies: Reading and writing in a multimodal world. Curriculum Press.
Cheah, M. Y. (1998). The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore. Language and Education, 12(3), 192-209.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies (pp. 1-36). Springer.
Dass, R. (2015). English literatures in post-colonial Singapore. Education Research and Perspectives, 42(1), 134-165.
Davidson, C. N., & Goldberg, D. T. (2009). The future of learning institutions in a digital age. MIT press.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2012). Fitting teacher education in/to/for an increasingly complex world. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 9(1), 30-40.
Doll Jr, W. E. (2012). Complexity and the culture of curriculum. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 9(1), 190-212.
Drewry, R. J., Cumming-Potvin, W. M., & Maor, D. (2019). New approaches to literacy problems: Multiliteracies and inclusive pedagogies. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(11), 61-78.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). Teaching reading to English language learners: A reflective guide. Corwin Press.
Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Routledge.
Goh, C. (2009). Perspectives on spoken grammar. ELT Journal, 63(4), 303-312.
Greene, M. (2000). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass.
Gyenes, T., & Wilks, J. (2014). Is the essay dead? Revitalising argument in the era of multiliteracies. English in Australia, 49(1), 7-15.
Ho, L.-C., Alviar-Martin, T., Sim, J. B.-Y., & Yap, P. S. (2011). Civic disparities: Exploring students' perceptions of citizenship within Singapore's academic tracks. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(2), 203-237.
Howell, E., Butler, T., & Reinking, D. (2017). Integrating multimodal arguments into high school writing instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(2), 181-209.
Hughes, J. M., & Morrison, L. (2014). The impact of social networking and a multiliteracies pedagogy on English language learners' writer identities. Writing & Pedagogy, 6(3), 607-631.
Hussain, H. B., Conner, L., & Mayo, E. (2014). Envisioning curriculum as six simultaneities. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 11(1), 59-84.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Johns, T., & Davies, F. (1983). Text as a vehicle for information: The classroom use of written texts in teaching reading in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1(1), 1-19.
Kaur, S., Ganapathy, M., & Sidhu, G. K. (2012). Designing learning elements using the multiliteracies approach in an ESL writing classroom. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 18(3), 119-134.
Kennedy, K. J., Chan, J. K. S., Fok, P. K., & Yu, W. M. (2008). Forms of assessment and their potential for enhancing learning: Conceptual and cultural issues. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(3), 197-207.
Kiss, T., & Mizusawa, K. (2018). Revisiting the pedagogy of multiliteracies: Writing instruction in a multicultural context. Changing English, 25(1), 59-68.
Kittle, P., & Gallagher, K. (2020). The curse of "helicopter teaching". Educational Leadership, 77(6), 14-19.
Kramer‐Dahl, A. (2008). Negotiating what counts as English language teaching: Official curriculum and its enactment in two Singaporean secondary classrooms. Research Papers in Education, 23(1), 85-107.
Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Psychology Press.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. Open University Press.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2018). Education and ‘new literacies’ in the middle years. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 26(2), 7-16.
Lee, R. (2016). Implementing dialogic teaching in a Singapore English language classroom. RELC Journal, 47(3), 279-293.
Leung, C. (2009). Second language teacher professionalism. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 49-58). Cambridge University Press.
Luke, A., Freebody, P., Shun, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2005). Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25(1), 5-28.
Macken-Horarik, M., & Horarik, S. (2019). ‘Multilite surfacing the assumptions: Pursuing critical literacy and social justice in preservice teacher education racies? I’m all for it… just don’t ask me how to teach it’: Insights from a survey of Australian teachers. In ESFLC2019 29th European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference: SFL on multi-literacies, professional discourse and education (p. 74). ESECS/ESTG.
MOE. (2020). The English language syllabus. Ministry of Education.
Moje, E. B. (2009). Standpoints: A call for new research on new and multi-literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 43(4), 348-362.
NLG (New London Group). (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 66(1), 60-92.
O'Byrne, W. I., & Smith, S. A. (2015). Multicultural education and multiliteracies: Exploration and exposure of literacy practices with preservice teachers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(2), 168-184.
Paesani, K. (2016). Investigating connections among reading, writing, and language development: A multiliteracies perspective. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 266-289.
Peterson, S. S., Botelho, M. J., Jang, E., & Kerekes, J. (2007). Writing assessment: What would multiliteracies teachers do? Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 15(1), 29-35.
Pratt, S. S. (2011). Emerging changes in teacher education. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 8(1), 43-49.
Robertson, L., & Hughes, J. (2012). Surfacing the assumptions: Pursuing critical literacy and social justice in preservice teacher education. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 22(1), 73-92.
Rowsell, J., Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2008). Fostering multiliteracies pedagogy through preservice teacher education. Teaching Education, 19(2), 109-122.
Ruiz-Gallardo, J. R., Fernández, B. G., & Jiménez, A. M. (2019). Visual literacy in preservice teachers: A case study in Biology. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 413-435.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Scherff, L., & Piazza, C. (2005). The more things change, the more they stay the same: A survey of high school students' writing experiences. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(3), 271-304.
Seglem, R., & Witte, S. (2009). You gotta see it to believe it: Teaching visual literacy in the English classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(3), 216-226.
Seow, A. (2002). The writing process and process writing. In J. C. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 315-320). Cambridge University Press.
Sewell, W. C., & Denton, S. (2011). Multimodal literacies in the secondary English classroom. English Journal, 100(5), 61-65.
Shivers, J., Levenson, C., & Tan, M. (2017). Visual literacy, creativity and the teaching of argument. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 67-84.
Stauffer, R. G. (1969). Directing reading maturity as a cognitive process. Harper & Row.
Teo, Y. (2019). This is what inequality looks like. Ethos Books.
Thornbury, S. (2001). Uncovering grammar. Macmillan.
Weninger, C., & Kiss, T. (2013). Culture in English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks: A semiotic approach. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 694-716.
Wong, J. O. (2014). The culture of Singapore English. Cambridge University Press.
