DETERMINATION OF POVERTY USING MULTI-FACETED MEASURES: EVIDENCE FROM ZAKAT APPLICANTS

  • Azhana Othman Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka, Malaysia
  • Abd Halim Mohd Noor Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka, Malaysia
  • Mohamed Saladin Abdul Rasool Centre for Islamic Philanthropy and Social Finance (CIPSF), Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka, Malaysia.
  • Eley Suzana Kasim Accounting Research Institute (ARI), Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Poverty, despite being a multifaceted concept, is commonly measured in either absolute or relative monetary terms. However, it can also be measured subjectively, as people form perceptions on their relative income, welfare, and life satisfaction. Poverty measurement based on objective indicators such as official poverty lines is often used to orient and prioritize policy actions. However, such ‘standard’ poverty measures based on household consumption or income aggregates have several shortcomings. This objective indicator does little to inform policy makers about public preferences. The main goal of this paper is to investigate multifaceted poverty measurement by combining objective and subjective measures to provide useful insights into poverty in Malaysia. In addition, this study explored the multifaceted poverty incidence among the low-income household from the perspective of zakat applicants.

 

Methodology: Data was collected using a survey and interviews of zakat applicants under the category of poor and needy in the State Islamic Religious Council (SIRC) of Melaka, one of the states in Malaysia. Three poverty measurements, i.e., Poverty Line Income (PLI), Haddul Kifayah and Subjective Poverty Index (SPI), are utilized in this study.

Findings: The PLI and Haddul Kifayah are categorized as objective poverty measures, while SPI is categorized as a subjective poverty measure. The different measures of poverty would produce different analytical results that, in turn, call for a different set of policy interventions.

 

Contributions: These findings point to the needs of tailor-made strategies for the society to cope with multifaceted poverty.

 

Keywords: Multifaceted poverty, objective poverty, subjective poverty, poverty measurement, zakat recipients.

 

Cite as: Othman, A., Mohd Noor, A. H., Abdul Rasool, M. S., & Kasim, E. S. (2023). Determination of poverty using multi-faceted measures: Evidence from zakat applicants.  Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(TI), 62-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8issTIpp62-86

References

Abd Manap, N., Zakaria, Z., & Hassan, R. (2017). Investigation of poverty indicators for designing case representation to determine urban poverty. International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing and Its Applications, 9(2), 90-106.

Abdul Rahman, M., Sani, N. S., Hamdan, R., Ali Othman, Z., & Abu Bakar, A. (2021). A clustering approach to identify multidimensional poverty indicators for the bottom 40 percent group. Plos One, 16(8), e0255312.

Akhtar, F., Shahkhan, S., & Mehmood, R. (2022). Poverty: An indicator of poor-performing socioeconomic systems in a region. Journal of Education & Humanities Research, University of Balochistan, Quetta-Pakistan, 13(1), 106-114.

Ali, A. F. M., Aziz, M. R. A., & Ibrahim, M. F. (2022). Zakat poverty line and poverty measurement for effective zakat distribution. UMK Press.

Alkire, S. (2011). Multidimensional Poverty and Its Discontents. (Unpublished OPHI working paper 46). Queen Elizabeth House (QEH), University of Oxford.

Alshater, M. M., Saad, R. A. J., Wahab, N. A., & Saba, I. (2021). What do we know about zakat literature? A bibliometric review. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(4), 544-563.

Buku Perangkaan. (2019). Statistics on women, family and community. Perangkaan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat. https://www.kpwkm.gov.my/kpwkm/uploads/files/Penerbitan/Buku%20Perangkaan/buku%20KPWKM%202019%20pdf.pdf

Dartanto, T., & Otsubo, S. T. (2015). Measurements and determinants of multifaceted poverty: Absolute, relative, and subjective poverty in Indonesia. In S. T. Otsubo (Ed.), Globalization and development volume III: In search of a new development
paradigm (pp. 69-113). Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Dartanto, T., & Otsubo, S. (2013). Measurements and determinants of multifaceted poverty: Absolute, relative, and subjective poverty in Indonesia. Japan International Cooperation Agency Research Institute.

Goedhart, T., Halberstadt, V., Kapteyn, A., & Van Praag, B. (1977). The poverty line: Concept and measurement. Journal of Human Resources, 12(4), 503-520.

Jansen, A., Moses, M., Mujuta, S., & Yu, D. (2015). Measurements and determinants of multifaceted poverty in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 32(2), 151-169.

JAWHAR. (2007). Manual pengurusan zakat. Jabatan Wakaf, Zakat dan Haji, Jabatan Perdana Menteri Malaysia.

Narayanan, D., & Patel, R. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us? Oxford University Press.

Niemietz, K. (2011). A new understanding of poverty. London Institute of Economic Affairs.

Othman, A. (2018). Does multifaceted poverty approach enhance the identification of the poor and needy in zakat institutions? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(11), 779–790.

Othman, A., Mohd Noor, A. H., & Rasool, M. S. A. (2018). A subjective poverty approach as an alternative measurement in identifying the poor and needy. International Journal of Zakat, 3(4), 95-102.

Rashid, K. A., Hasan, S. F., & Sarkawi, A. A. (2015). Haddul Kifayah: Its comprehensiveness, sufficiency and currency in meeting the needs of the asnaf faqr and asnaf miskin. In The National Conference on Zakat and Economic Development (pp. 226-
246). Universiti Malaysia Pahang.

Rasool, M. S. A., & Salleh, A. M. (2014). Non-monetary poverty measurement in Malaysia: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah approach. Islamic Economic Studies, 22(2), 33-45.

Reeves, L. S., Parsell, C., & Liu, S. (2019). Towards a phenomenology of poverty: Defining poverty through the lived experiences of the ‘poor’. Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 439-454.

Sen, A. K. (1983). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35(2), 153-169.

Taha, R., Mohd Nor, M. N., Embong, M. R., & Zulkifli, M. F. (2017). Zakat fund in Malaysia: Where does it go to? Management & Accounting Review, 16(1), 137-165.

Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. Penguin.

Van Praag, B. M., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2006). A multidimensional approach to subjective poverty. In N. Kakwani, & J. Silber (Eds.), Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement (pp. 135-154). Palgrave Macmillan.

Voukelatou, V., Gabrielli, L., Miliou, I., Cresci, S., Sharma, R., Tesconi, M., & Pappalardo, L. (2021). Measuring objective and subjective well-being: Dimensions and data sources. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 11(4), 279-309.

Wang, H., Zhao, Q., Bai, Y., Zhang, L., & Yu, X. (2020). Poverty and subjective poverty in rural China. Social Indicators Research, 150(1), 219-242.
Published
2023-09-30
How to Cite
Othman, A., Mohd Noor, A. H., Abdul Rasool, M. S., & Kasim, E. S. (2023). DETERMINATION OF POVERTY USING MULTI-FACETED MEASURES: EVIDENCE FROM ZAKAT APPLICANTS. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 8(3), 62-86. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss3pp62-86