Factors influencing artificial intelligence (AI) adoption among Malaysian students: A partial least square-structural equation modeling approach

Authors

  • Qaribu Yahaya Nasidi Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 21300 Kampung Gong Badak, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • Isyaku Hassan Faculty of Language and Communication, University Sultan Zainal Abidin, 21300 Kampung Gong Badak, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • Muhamad Fazil Ahmad Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 21300 Kampung Gong Badak, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • Abubakar Shehu Department of Development and Strategic Communication, Faculty of Communications, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol10iss2pp475-493

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming higher education by enhancing learning experiences through personalised instruction, automated assessments, and intelligent tutoring systems. In Malaysia, AI adoption among students is gaining momentum, and it is influenced by digital literacy, perceived usefulness, and social influence. This study examines the key factors influencing AI adoption among Malaysian students.

Methodology: A survey research design was employed, utilising a structured questionnaire distributed to 286 students across four Malaysian universities. 224 valid responses were analysed using Partial Least Square (PLS-SEM) to test the hypothesised relationships among the variables.

Findings: Results indicate that social influence has the most substantial effect on AI adoption (β = 0.503, p < 0.001), followed by perceived usefulness (β = 0.236, p < 0.001) and digital literacy (β = 0.188, p = 0.036). These findings suggest that students are more likely to adopt AI when they observe peers and educators using it effectively. Additionally, students who perceive AI as beneficial for academic performance are more willing to engage with AI technologies.

Implication: The study contributes to understanding AI adoption in higher education; institutions can better prepare students for an AI-driven academic and professional landscape by addressing the identified factors.

Keywords:  AI adoption, digital literacy, Malaysian students, perceived usefulness, social influence.

References

Abadi, I., & Hasanuddin, H. (2024). The role of leadership in effective and efficient human resource management decision making. Journal of Economics Review, 4(2), 170-183.

Almaiah, M. A., Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S. A., Hajjej, F., Thabit, S., El-Qirem, F. A., Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., Al Mulhem, A., & Alkhdour, T. (2022). Examining the impact of artificial intelligence and social and computer anxiety in e-learning settings: Students’ perceptions at the university level. Electronics, 11(22), 1-22.

Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., Yitmen, I., & Homod, R. Z. (2023). Enhancing student engagement: Harnessing “AIED”’s power in hybrid education—A review analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), 1-24.

Anurogo, D., La Ramba, H., Putri, N. D., & Putri, U. M. P. (2023). Digital literacy 5.0 to enhance multicultural education. Multicultural Islamic Education Review, 1(2), 109-179.

Bogoslov, I. A., Corman, S., & Lungu, A. E. (2024). Perspectives on artificial intelligence adoption for European Union elderly in the context of digital skills development. Sustainability, 16(11), 1-34.

Capinding, A. T., & Dumayas, F. T. (2024). Transformative pedagogy in the digital age: Unraveling the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(5), 630-657.

Chang, Z., Liu, S., Xiong, X., Cai, Z., & Tu, G. (2021). A survey of recent advances in edge-computing-powered artificial intelligence of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(18), 13849-13875.

Chatterjee, R. (2020). Fundamental concepts of artificial intelligence and its applications. Journal of Mathematical Problems, Equations and Statistics, 1(2), 13-24.

Chen, Z., & Zainudin, Z. (2024). Systematic review on developing digital literacy approach in higher education institution. Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 234-241.

Chung, Y., Li, Y., & Jia, J. (2021). Exploring embeddedness, centrality, and social influence on backer behavior: The role of backer networks in crowdfunding. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 49(1), 925-946.

Ciampa, K., Wolfe, Z. M., & Bronstein, B. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Transforming digital literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 67(3), 186-195.

Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., & Kent, C. (2020). Impact of an artificial intelligence research frame on the perceived credibility of educational research evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(2), 205-235.

Damerji, H., & Salimi, A. (2021). Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting. Accounting Education, 30(2), 107-130.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., & Eirug, A. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57(1), 101994.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Frenkenberg, A., & Hochman, G. (2025). It’s scary to use it, it’s scary to refuse it: The psychological dimensions of AI Adoption—Anxiety, motives, and dependency. Systems, 13(2), 1-25.

George, A. S. (2023). Preparing students for an AI-driven world: Rethinking curriculum and pedagogy in the age of artificial intelligence. Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication, 1(2), 112-136.

Gerlich, M. (2023a). Perceptions and acceptance of artificial intelligence: A multi-dimensional study. Social Sciences, 12(9), 1-24.

Gerlich, M. (2023b). The power of virtual influencers: Impact on consumer behaviour and attitudes in the age of AI. Administrative Sciences, 13(8), 1-21.

Gupta, R., Nair, K., Mishra, M., Ibrahim, B., & Bhardwaj, S. (2024). Adoption and impacts of generative artificial intelligence: Theoretical underpinnings and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(1), 100232.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature.

Hasija, A., & Esper, T. L. (2022). In Artificial Intelligence (AI) we trust: A qualitative investigation of AI technology acceptance. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(3), 388-412.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.

Joa, C. Y., & Magsamen-Conrad, K. (2022). Social influence and UTAUT in predicting digital immigrants’ technology use. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(8), 1620-1638.

Kar, S., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, M. P. (2021). Modeling drivers and barriers of artificial intelligence adoption: Insights from a strategic management perspective. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 28(4), 217-238.

Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77(1), 101925.

Khan, N., Sarwar, A., Chen, T. B., & Khan, S. (2022). Connecting digital literacy in higher education to the 21st century workforce. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 14(1), 46-61.

Kühl, N., Schemmer, M., Goutier, M., & Satzger, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence and machine learning. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2235-2244.

Lee, J.-C., & Chen, X. (2022). Exploring users' adoption intentions in the evolution of artificial intelligence mobile banking applications: The intelligent and anthropomorphic perspectives. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(4), 631-658.

Ma, S., & Lei, L. (2024). The factors influencing teacher education students’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence technology for information-based teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 94-111.

Makeleni, S., Mutongoza, B. H., & Linake, M. A. (2023). Language education and artificial intelligence: An exploration of challenges confronting academics in global south universities. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 6(2), 158-171.

Massoudi, A., Zaidan, M. N., & Agha, A. Q. (2024). The adoption of technology acceptance model in e-commerce with artificial intelligence as a mediator. GECONTEC: Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología, 12(2), 20-36.

Nasidi, Q., Ahmad, M., Abdulkadir, J., & Garba, M. (2022). Analysing the mediating effect of social media on online shopping using partial least square. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(2), e202213.

Nikou, S., De Reuver, M., & Mahboob Kanafi, M. (2022). Workplace literacy skills—how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 371-391.

Papagiannidis, E., Enholm, I. M., Dremel, C., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2023). Toward AI governance: Identifying best practices and potential barriers and outcomes. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 123-141.

Rahman, M., Ming, T. H., Baigh, T. A., & Sarker, M. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in banking services: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(10), 4270-4300.

Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783.

Russell, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and the problem of control. In H. Werthner, E. Prem, A. Lee, & E.A., Ghezzi, C. (Eds.), Perspectives on digital humanism (pp. 19-24). Springer.

Sadriwala, M. F., & Sadriwala, K. F. (2022). Perceived usefulness and ease of use of artificial intelligence on marketing innovation. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy, 13(1), 1-10.

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Springer.

Sharma, S., Islam, N., Singh, G., & Dhir, A. (2022). Why do retail customers adopt artificial intelligence (AI) based autonomous decision-making systems? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71(1), 1846-1861.

Sova, R., Tudor, C., Tartavulea, C. V., & Dieaconescu, R. I. (2024). Artificial intelligence tool adoption in higher education: A structural equation modeling approach to understanding impact factors among economics students. Electronics, 13(18), 3632.

Upadhyay, N., Upadhyay, S., Abed, S. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022a). Consumer adoption of mobile payment services during COVID-19: Extending meta-UTAUT with perceived severity and self-efficacy. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(5), 960-991.

Upadhyay, N., Upadhyay, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022b). Theorizing artificial intelligence acceptance and digital entrepreneurship model. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(5), 1138-1166.

Wilson, N., Keni, K., & Tan, P. H. P. (2021). The role of perceived usefulness and perceived ease-of-use toward satisfaction and trust which influence computer consumers' loyalty in China. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 23(3), 262-294.

Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2024). AI in teacher education: Unlocking new dimensions in teaching support, inclusive learning, and digital literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1871-1885.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Factors influencing artificial intelligence (AI) adoption among Malaysian students: A partial least square-structural equation modeling approach. (2025). Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 10(2), 475-493. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol10iss2pp475-493