Analisis Metode Penerangan Hadith BerÊ»illah Dalam Sahih Muslim Menurut Ḥamzah Al-MalyabÄrÄ« [Analysis of Method of Explaining Hadith Al-Ê»ilal In Sahih Muslim According To Ḥamzah Al-MalyabÄrÄ«]

Authors

  • Ibrahim Adham Mohd Rokhibi Universiti Malaya
  • Khadher Ahmad Universiti Malaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2022.23.2.682

Abstract

á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim merupakan salah satu kitab hadith yang muktabar dan penting dalam pengajian kitab hadith bersanad. Banyak kajian lepas telah membuktikan bahawa antara metodologi utama Imam Muslim adalah meletakkan hadith-hadith paling sahih di awal bab. Walau bagaimanapun,  metodologi penyusunan Imam Muslim terhadap hadith-hadith dalam sahihnya pelbagai dan mempunyai tujuan serta nilai ilmiah sangat tinggi bagi menerangkan keberadaan Ê»illah pada sesuatu sanad mahupun matan. Bertitik tolak daripada itu, artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis metode penerangan hadith berÊ»illah dalam á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim menurut Ḥamzah al-MalyabÄrÄ«. Analisis dilakukan dengan merujuk kepada kitab-kitab Ê»ilal serta kajian-kajian berkaitan metodologi á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim. Hasilnya dapat menjelaskan salah faham masyarakat terhadap kitab ini serta boleh dimanfaatkan oleh pengkaji hadith semasa dalam berinteraksi dengan hadith á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim.

á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim is one of the greatest manuscript in Hadith and studies of transmitter. Many researches had come out that amid methodology of Imam Muslim, the most significant one is to accommodate the authentic hadith in early chapter. However, Imam Muslim's method towards compilation of authentic hadith in his á¹¢aḥīḥ is various, and it has a very high purpose and intellectual value to explain the existense of deficiencies in the text or the chain of hadith (ilal hadith). Starting from that, this article aims to analyze the method of explanation of ilal hadith in á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim according to Ḥamzah al-MalyabÄrÄ«. The analysis was conducted with reference to the books of Ê»ilal as well as studies related to the methodology of á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim. The result of this research can clarify the community's misunderstanding of this book and can be used by current hadith researchers in interacting with the hadiths of á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslims.

References

ʻAbd al-Raḥmān bin Aḥmad bin Rajab al-Ḥanbalī. (2014). Sharḥ ʻIlal al-Tirmidhī. ed. Nūr al-Dīn ʻItr. Kaherah: Dār al-Salām.
Abū al-Ḥasan ʻAlī bin ʻUmar. (1985). Al-ʻIlal al-Wāridah fī al-Aḥādīth al-Nabawiyyah. ed. Maḥfūẓ al-Raḥmān Zayn Allāh al-Salafī. Al-Riyāḍ: Dār al-Ṭaybah.
Abū Bakr Aḥmad bin al-Ḥusayn al-Bayhaqī. (1991). Maʻrifah al-Sunan wa al-Āthār. ed. ʻAbd al-Muʻṭī Amīn Qalʻajī. Al-Qāhirah: Dār al-Wafā’.
Abū Khālid al-Imārātī, “Tarjamah al-Mūjizah li al-Shaykh Ḥamzah al-Malyabārī”, laman sesawang Multaqā Ahl al-Ḥadīth, dicapai 31 Mei 2020, http://www.ahlalhdeeth.com/~ahl/vb/showthread.php?s=a4da12b0cdbe845852eb9c9672915d3d&t=3662.
Aḥmad bin al-Ḥusayn Abū Bakr al-Bayhaqī. (t.t.). Al-Madkhal ilā al-Sunan al-Kubrā. ed. Muḥammad Ḍiyā’ al-Raḥmān al-Aʻẓamī. Al-Kuwayt: Dār al-Khulafā’ li al-Kitāb al-Islāmī.
Aḥmad bin ʻAlī bin Ḥajar al-ʻAsqalānī. (1994). Al-Nukat ʻalā Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ. ed. Rabīʻ bin Hādī ʻUmayr al-Madkhalī, al-Riyāḍ: Dār al-Rāyah.
Aḥmad bin ʻAlī Manjūyah. (1407). Rijāl Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. ed. ʻAbd Allāh al-Laythī. Beirut: Dār al-Maʻrifah.
ʻAlī ʻAbd al-Bāsiṭ Mazīd. (t.t.). Minhāj al-Muḥaddithīn fī al-Qarni al-Awwal al-Hijrī hattā ʻAṣrinā al-Ḥāḍir. t.tp.: al-Hay’ah al-Miṣriyyah al-ʻĀmah li al-Kitāb.
ʻĀshūr Dihnī. (2005). Manhaj al-Imām Muslim bin al-Ḥajjāj fī Dhikr al-Akhbār al-Muʻallalah min Khilāl Kitābih al-Musnad al-Ṣaḥīḥ. Disertasi Sarjana Universiti Bātinah Algeria.
Fauzi Deraman. (2000). Metodologi Muḥaddithīn: Suatu Sorotan. Jurnal Usuluddin 12(1).

Ḥāfiẓ bin Aḥmad bin ʻAlī al-Ḥakamī. (t.t.). Dalīl Arbāb al-Falāḥ li Taḥqīq Fann al-Iṣṭilāḥ. ed. oleh Khālid bin Qāsim al-Radādī. Jeddah: Dār al-Minhāj.
Ḥamzah ʻAbd Allāh al-Malyabārī. (2004). Mā Hākadhā Tūradu Yā Saʻd al-Ibil. Beirūt: Dār Ibn Ḥazm.
Ismāʻīl bin ʻUmar bin Kathīr al-Qarashī. (1419). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-ʻAẓīm. ed. Muḥammad Ḥusayn Shams al-Dīn. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah.
Mohd Faiz Hakimi Mat Idris, Ishak Suliaman, Ahmad Zahid Salleh, Sofyuddin Yusof, Abdillah Hisham Abdul Wahab, Mohd A’Tarahim Mohd Razali & Nor Hafizi Yusof. (2015). Metodologi Imam Muslim dalam Penyusunan Teks Hadith dalam Sahihnya. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 10(1): 73-81.
Muḥammad ʻAwwāmah. (2017). Min Manhaj al-Imām Muslim fī ʻ Araḍi al-Ḥadīth al-Muʻallal fī Ṣaḥīḥihi. Jeddah: Dār al-Minhāj.
Muḥammad bin Ismāʻīl al-Bukhārī. (t.t.). al-Tārīkh al-Kabīr. Hayderabad: Dā’irah al-Maʻārif al-ʻUthmāniyyah.
Muḥyi al-Yaḥyā bin Sharaf al-Nawawī. (1392). Al-Minhāj Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim bin al-Ḥajjāj. Beirūt: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.
Muslim bin al-Hajjaj. (t.t.). Al-Musnad al-Sahih al-Mukhtasar bi Naql al-ʻAdl ʻan al-ʻAdl ila Rasulillah SAW. ed. Muhammad Fu’ad ʻAbd al-Baqi. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-ʻArabi.
Rohaizan Baru. (2014). Mukhtalif Al-Hadith: Wacana Perbahasan Kontradiksi Hadith. Jurnal Islam Dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 1: 23-41.
Umar Muhammad Noor. (2016). Aliran Iḥyā’ Manhaj al-Mutaqaddimīn dan Pembaharuan Wacana Kritik Hadis Moden. Jurnal Hadis 6 (12). 35.
Umar Muhammad Noor. (2018). Aliran Kritik Hadith Semasa: Analisis Metode Kritik Abu Ishaq al-Huwayni, Mahmud Saʻid Mamduh dan Hamzah al-Malyabārī. Tesis PhD Universiti Malaya.
ʻUthmān bin ʻAbd al-Raḥmān Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ. (1408). Siyānah Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim min al-Ikhlāl wa al-Ghalaṭ wa Ḥimāyatih min al-Isqat wa al-Saqt. ed. Mawfiq ʻAbd Allāh ʻAbd al-Qādir. Beirūt: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.
Yūsuf bin ʻAbd al-Raḥmān al-Mizzī. (1980). Tahdhīb al-Kamāl fī Asmā’ al-Rijāl. ed. Bashhār ʻAwwād Maʻrūf. Beirūt: Mu’assasah al-Risālah.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Analisis Metode Penerangan Hadith Berʻillah Dalam Sahih Muslim Menurut Ḥamzah Al-Malyabārī [Analysis of Method of Explaining Hadith Al-ʻilal In Sahih Muslim According To Ḥamzah Al-Malyabārī]. (2022). Jurnal Islam Dan Masyarakat Kontemporari, 23(2), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2022.23.2.682