Pandangan Dan Interaksi ‘Abd Allah al-Ghumari Terhadap Hadis al-Mahdawiyyah [‘Abd Allah al-Ghumari’s Opinion And Interaction On al-Mahdawiyyah Hadiths]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2022.23.2.683Abstract
Kemunculan Imam Mahdi merupakan sebahagian daripada tanda berlakunya Hari Kiamat dan perkara ini telah menjadi pegangan akidah umat Islam secara majoriti. ‘Abd Allah al-Ghumari (w.1993) antara ulama yang membincangkan hal ini dengan begitu terperinci di dalam kitabnya bertajuk al-Mahdi al-Muntazar. Pegangan dan kepercayaan ini terbina daripada hadis-hadis al-Mahdawiyyah yang diriwayatkan oleh para sahabat daripada Rasulullah SAW secara mutawatir. Namun begitu, terdapat beberapa kelompok ilmuan yang menolak kebenaran Imam Mahdi dan mempertikaikan tahap mutawatir hadis al-Mahdawiyyah. Di samping itu, berlaku khilaf antara ulama tentang pensabitan Imam Mahdi. Keadaan bertambah kritikal apabila wujud pelbagai golongan yang mendakwa akan datangnya Imam Mahdi itu dalam kalangan mereka dan wujudnya salah faham tentang konsep al-Mahdi tidak selari dengan apa yang telah digariskan oleh ulama Ahli Sunnah wal Jamaah. Metode penulisan artikel ini mengaplikasikan reka bentuk kualitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis kandungan berfokuskan kepada karya ‘Abd Allah al-Ghumari dan disokong beberapa literatur yang berkaitan. Seterusnya, data yang diperoleh dalam kajian ini dianalisis secara deskriptif dan tematik. Artikel ini mengungkapkan konsep al-Mahdi dan kemutawatiran hadis al-Mahdawiyyah daripada sudut pandangan ‘Abd Allah al-Ghumari. Beliau dilihat konsisten dalam mengemukakan hujah kewujudan Imam al-Mahdi dan seterusnya menjawab permasalahan berkaitan hadis al-Mahdawiyyah dalam kerangka kepakarannya sebagai seorang muhaddith.
The emergence of Imam Mahdi is part of the sign of the Day of Judgment and this has become the majority of Muslim faiths. ‘Abd AllÄh al-GhumÄri (w.1993) is among the scholars who have discussed this matter so thoroughly in his book titled al-Mahdi al-Muntazar. These faiths and beliefs have been built from the al-Mahdawiyyah hadiths that were narrated by the companions from the Rasulullah SAW succesively. However, there are several scholars who have rejected the truth of Imam Mahdi and dispute the succesive level of al-Mahdawiyyah hadiths. In addition, there has been a contradiction between the scholars about the conviction of Imam Mahdi. The situation is increasingly critical when there are various groups who claim that Imam Mahdi will come from among them and there is a misunderstanding about the concept of al-Mahdi with guidelines have been gazetted by Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamaah scholars. The writings method of this article has applied the qualitative design by using the content analysis approach focusing on the work of ‘Abd AllÄh al-GhumÄri and supported by some relevant literature. Next, the data obtained in this study was analysed descriptively and thematically. This article reveals the concept of al-Mahdi and the succescive of al-Mahdawiyah hadiths from the point of view of ‘Abd AllÄh al-GhumÄri. He was seen to be consistent in presenting his opinion on the existence of Imam Mahdi and he had answered the problem of the al-Mahdawiyyah hadiths in his expertise as a muhaddith.
References
Al-‘Abbad, ‘Abd al-Muhsin bin Hamad. (1996). Aqidah Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-AthÄr fi al-Mahdi al-Muntazar. Mesir, Kaherah Maktabah al-Sunnah.
Ahmad bin Hanbal. (1956). Musnad Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. Pentahqiq: Ahmad Syakir. Mesir: Dar al-Maarif.
Aminduddin Basir & Akila Mamat. (2016). Konsep Berpegang kepada al-Quran dan al-Sunnah Menurut Manhaj Ahli Hadith. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 12(1):48-58.
Al-‘Asqalani, Ibn Hajar. (2018). Nuzhat al-Nazar fi Taudih Nukhbat al-Fikar. Syria, Halab: Dar al-Itrah al-Nabawiyyah.
Al-Barzanji, Muhammad bin Rasul. (2005). al-IshÄ’ah li AshrÄt al-SÄ’ah. Cetakan Ketiga. Lubnan, Beirut: Dar al-Minhaj.
Al-Bustawi, Abd al-Alim ‘Abd al-Zaim. (1999). al-Mahdi al-Muntazar fi Dhau’ al-AhÄdith wa al-AthÄr al-Sahihah wa AqwÄl al-‘UlamÄ’ al-FirÄq al-Mukhtalifah. Cetakan Pertama. Lubnan, Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm.
Farouk Hamadah. (2006). ‘Abd AllÄh bin Siddiq al-GhumÄri al-HÄfiz al-NÄqid. Makalah: ‘UlamÄ’ wa Mufakkirun Mu’Äsirun Lamahat Hayatihim wa Ta’rif bi Muallafatihim, Edisi :29. Cetakan Pertama. Damsyik: Dar al-Qalam.
Al-Ghalbazuri, Nusaibah. (2001). ‘Abd Allah bin al-Siddiq al-GhumÄri: Juhuduhu wa ManhÄjuhu fi al-Tafsir wa ‘Ulum al-Quran. Tesis Peringkat Doktor Falsafah, Jabatan Pengajian Islam, Fakulti Sastera dan Sains Sosial. Universiti Muhammad V. Rabat, Maghribi.
Al-Ghouri, Abdul Majid. (2013). al-Muyassar Ilm MustalÄh al-Hadith. Cetakan Ketiga. Selangor: Darul Syakir Enterprise.
Al-Ghumari, ‘Abd Allah bin Siddiq. 2016. Mausu’ah al-‘AllÄmah al-Muhaddith al-Mutafannin Sayyidi al-Syarif ‘Abd Allah bin Muhammad bin Siddiq al-Ghumari al-Hasani. Cetakan Kedua. Mesir, Kaherah-Iskandariah: Dar al-Salam.
Hibbi Farihin. (2016). Hermeneutika Rabbaniy Ala Hadis Qudsi Riwayat Huzaifah Bin al-Yaman. Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis 2(2).
Ibn Kathir. t.t. al-Ba’ith al-Hathith Syarah IkhtisÄr ‘Ulum al-Hadith. Lubnan, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub Ilmiyyah.
Ibn Khaldun. (2004). Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldun. Cetakan Pertama. Syria, Damsyik: Dar al-Yu’rab.
Ibn Salah,’Uthman bin Abd al-Rahman al-Syahrazuri. (2011). Muqaddimah Ibn Salah. Cetakan Pertama. Syria, Damsyik: Dar al-Mustafa.
Al-Jabbari, ‘Abd Allah. (2011). al-Ijtihad al-Fiqhi ‘Inda al-HÄfiz ‘Abd AllÄh bin Siddiq al-Ghumari al-Hasani. Cetakan Pertama. Lubnan, Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm.
Al-Kattani, Ja’afar al-Hasani. (1980). Nazm al-MutanÄthir min Hadith al-Mutawatir. Lubnan, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Mahmud Tahhan. (2012). Taysir Mustalah al-Hadith. Cetakan Kedua. Pakistan, Karachi: Maktabah al-Busyra.
Al-Makki, Abu al-‘Abbas Muhammad bin Muhammad. (t.t). al-Qawl al-Mukhtasar fi Alamat al-Mahdi al-Muntazar. Kaherah, Bulaq: Maktabah al-Quran.
Misbahuddin. (2018). Problematika Cara Memahami Hadis Akhir Zaman Dalam Pandangan Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamaah. Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 4(2).
Muhammad Rizka Muqtada. (2019). Mahdisme Dalam Hadis-Hadis Mahdawiyyah. Jurnal Theologia 30(2): 239-266.
Muhyiddin bin Hashim. (2011). Ibn Khaldun wa Mawqifuhu min ‘Ulum al-Quran. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 4: 73-100.
Nuruddin ‘Itr. (2020). Manhaj Naqd fi ‘Ulum al-Hadith. Cetakan Ketiga., Syria, Damsyik: Dar al-Fikri.
Al-Qinnauji, Muhammad Sadiq Hassan Khan. (1979). al-IdhÄ’ah Li MÄ KÄna Bayna Yadaiyya al-SÄ’ah. Lubnan, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Rashid Rida. (1947). Tafsir al-Manar. Cetakan Kedua. Mesir, Kaherah: Dar al-Nawadir.
Al-Safarini, Muhammad bin Ahmad. (1981). LawÄmi’ al-AnwÄr al-Bahiyyah wa SawÄti’ al-AsrÄr al-Athariyyah. Syria, Damsyik: Mansyurat Muassasah al-Khafiqin.
Al-Silmi, Yusuf bin Yahya. (1989). Al-Aqd al-Durar fi AkhbÄr al-Muntazar. Cetakan Kedua. Jordan, al-Zarqa’: Maktabah al-Manar.
Al-Wabil, Yusuf bin ‘Abd Allah. (1994). AsyrÄt al-SÄ’ah. Cetakan Keempat. Arab Saudi, Riyadh: Dar Ibn al-Jawzi.
Al-Walid, Mahmud Rajab Hamadi. (2002). Kasyf al-Manan fi AlamÄt al-SÄ’ah wa al-MalÄhim wa al-Fitan: Ru’yah al-Mustaqbal al-‘Alam al-Islami fi Dhau’ al-Kitab wa al-Sunnah. Cetakan Pertama. Lubnan, Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in JIMK journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
