Teori Evolutionism dalam Epistemologi Usul Fiqh dari Perspektif Barat [The Theory of Evolutionism in the Epistemology of Usul Fiqh From the Western Perspective]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2022.23.3.692Abstract
Perkembangan hukum Islam yang mencapai kemuncak kegemilangan pada zaman kerajaan Abasiyyah telah menarik perhatian sarjana Barat dalam menghasilkan pelbagai kajian dan teori terhadap Zaman Keemasan hukum Islam atau The Golden Age of Islamic Jurisprudence. Penglibatan Ignaz Goldziher, Joseph Schacht, David Powers dan Wael Hallaq telah menghasilkan pelbagai kajian terhadap perkembangan usul fiqh dan sebahagian daripada karya mereka telah mendapat pengiktirafan daripada sarjana Barat sebagai The Sacred Book of Islamic Law, dan The Father of Islamic Studies. Teori Evolutionism merupakan rumusan pemahaman Barat yang merupakan garapan pemahaman umum orientalis Barat terhadap Zaman Kegemilangan hukum Islam yang didakwa terhasil akibat wujudnya elemen asing (Foreign Elements). Artikel ini dihasilkan untuk menganalisis karya penulisan Goldziher, Joseph Schacht, Wael Hallaq dan beberapa pandangan daripada orientalis kontemporari dalam menilai variasi pandangan mereka terhadap perkembangan hukum Islam yang didakwa berasaskan dogma daripada Barat. Kajian ini berasaskan kajian kualitatif dan penganalisisan data menggunakan metodologi historis dan komparatif. Hasil penganalisisan dapat dirumuskan bahawa dakwaan Goldziher dan Schacht terhadap epistemologi usul fiqh yang berasaskan dogma Barat adalah tidak tepat dan ia menafikan Teori Evolutionism dan teori The Legal Transplant yang telah diperkenalkan oleh orientalis Barat terhadap epistemologi usul fiqh.
The development of Islamic Law during the Abbasid period, known as The Golden Age of Islamic Jurisprudence has attracted the attention of western scholars and their contribution in Islamic Law. Many books and articles on usul fiqh written by Ignaz Goldziher, Joseph Schacht, David Powers, and Wael Hallaq were acknowledged by the Westerners and some of their contributions were known as The Sacred Book of Islamic Law and The Father of Islamic Studies. The Theory of Evolutionism was a stigmatism of Orientalists writing on the zenith of Islamic law during the third century, which derived from foreign elements. This article is to analyze the writing of Goldziher, Joseph Schacht, Wael Hallaq, and other Orientalists on their assumption of western dogma in Islamic Jurisprudence. This study used qualitative, historic, and comparative methodologies. The findings verified the invalidation in Schacht and Goldziher allegation on the foreign elements in usul fiqh. Thus, the Legal Transplant and the Theory of Evolutionism evolved by the Westerners in the methodology of usul fiqh are rejected.
References
Abu Zaid, Farouq. (1986). Hukum Islam: Antara Tradisionalis dan Modenis, terj. H. Husein Muhammad. Jakarta: Penerbit Perhimpunan pengembangan Pesantren dan Masyarakat.
Ahmad Gumma Sidek, (2017). “Orientalism and Orientalists Between Extremism and Exaggeration,†American International Journal of Social Science (6) 3: 141.
Ahmad Hasan. (1986). Analogical Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Study of the Juridical Principal of Qiyas. Pakistan: Islamic Research Institute.
Akh Minhaji. (1997). “Kontribusi Dr. Wael Hallaq Dalam Kajian Hukum Islam,†dalam Yudian W. Asmin et al. (edt.), Pengalaman Belajar Islam di Kanada. Yogyakarta: Titian Ilahi Press.
Ansari, Z.I. (2016). “The Early Development of Islamic Fiqh in Kufah With Special Reference to the Works of Abu Yussuf and Shaybaniâ€, Islamic Studies Journal (55)1: 149-191.
Arif Maftuhin, (2016). “The Historigraphy of Islamic Law: The Case of Tarikh al-Tashri’ Literatureâ€, al-Jami’ah Journal of Islamic Studies (54)2: 374.
Badran, Abu al-‘Aynayn. (1984). Usul al-Fiqh al-Islami. Iskandariah: Muassasah Shabab..
Bowler, P.J. (1975). The Changing Meaning of Evolution, Journal of the History of Ideas (36)1: 95-114.
al-Bukhari, (t.th.). Sahih Al-Bukhari, Kitab al Inshar wa Jaza’ al- Shaid, Juz 6: no. 1720.
Edward, Said. (1981). Liputan Berita Tentang Islam, terj. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Selangor: Percetakan Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Faruqi, Mohammad Yusuf (1985). Development of Usul Al-Fiqh. Islamabad: International Islamic University..
Hallaq, W.B. (2009). Shari’a, Theory, Practice and Transformation. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Hurgronje, S. (1957). Selected Works of C. Snouck Hurgronje. Leidenn: E.J. Brill.
Jameela, Maryam (1969). Islam Versus The West. New Delhi: Kitab Bhavan.
Khadduri, Majid (1955). Law in The Middle East, edit. Majid Khadduri, Herbert J. Liebesny. Washington: The Mddle East Institute.
Khallaf, ‘Abd al-Wahhab. (1942). ‘Ilm al-Usul al-Fiqh: Wa Khulasat Tarikh al-Tasyri’ al-Islami. Kaherah: Dar al-Qalam.
Mahmood Zuhdi Abdul Majid, (1992). Sejarah Pembinaan Hukum Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbitan Universiti Malaya.
Mar’ah Nailul Faroh, (2018). “Hadis dan Orientalis, Teori Ignaz Goldziher dan Joseph Schachtâ€, dikemaskini 5 Julai, 2018, dicapai 25 April 2020, http://www.academia.edu).
Motzki, Harald. (2002). The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence Meccan Fiqh Before The Classical Schools, terj. Marion H. Katz, Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.
al-Nimr, ‘Abd al-Mu’im, (1987). Al-Ijtihad. Kaherah: Al-Hay’ah al-Misriyyah al-‘Amah Lilkitab.
Powers, D.S. (2010). “Wael Hallaq on the Origins of Islamic Law: A Review Essay,†Journal Islamic Law and Society (17):129.
Rafiq, Aayesha, (2016). Influences, and Comparability: The Case of Islamic Law, Islamic Research Institute (55)1: 121-123.
Rahimin Affandi Abdul Rahim. (2012). “Pemodenan dan Kesejahteraan Manusia Dari Perspektif Orientalismeâ€, dalam Malaysian Journal of History and Strategy (39)2: 1-23.
Roman, P.C. (1987). Provincial and Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schacht, J. (1950). The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Schacht, J. (1982). An Introduction To Islamic Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Valderrama, I.J.M. (2003). “Legal Transplant and Comparative Law,â€International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional (2)2: 63-89.
Watson, Alan, (1974). Legal Transplant: An Approach to Comparative Law, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Wegner, J.R. (1982). “ Islamic and Talmudic Jurisprudence: The Four Roots of Islamic Law and Their Talmudic Counterparts,†The American Journal of Legal History (25)1: 29-58.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in JIMK journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
