Analysis of The Arabic Language Debate Strategy in the Asian Parliamentary Format for Developing Critical Thinking Skills Within the Debate Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2024.25.2.880Keywords:
Strategy, Asian Parliamentary debate, critical thinking, Arabic language.Abstract
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the Arabic language debate strategy in the Asian Parliamentary format for developing critical thinking skills within the debate community. Using qualitative methods with thematic analysis, data were collected through interviews, documentation, and observation. The results show that participation in the Arabic language debate in the Asian Parliamentary format can enhance skills in argument analysis, evidence evaluation, and the construction of logical and structured arguments. Moreover, debates also play a crucial role in improving Arabic language skills such as vocabulary enhancement and public speaking. Debates help participants understand complex issues and think logically and systematically. Therefore, this debate strategy has proven effective in developing critical thinking and language skills within the debate community.
References
Fahrurrozi, M. (2021). The Urgency of Strengthening Critical Thinking Skills in the Subject of Qur'an Hadith. Jurnal Penelitian Keislaman, 17(1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.20414/jpk.v17i1.3369
Fikri, M., & Munfarida, E. (2023). Construction of Critical Thinking in Islamic Education: An Analysis of Thematic Interpretation Based on the Qur'an. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam: Al- Thariqah, 8(1): 108–120. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-thariqah.2023.vol8(1).11469.
Hikam, A. I., Zainul, I., & Kraksaan, H. (2020). Analysis of Debate Learning Using Interactive Power Point Media 2013 in MA Sirajul Ulum Jatiurip Krejengan Probolinggo Students. Akademika, 2(2): 147-162.
Hoffman, D. W. (n.d.). The Strategy of Implementing Qatar Debates to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Students at the Institute of Modern Islamic Education Darunnajah Barubis.
Muslihasari, A., & Oktiningrum, W. (2023). Debate with Mind Mapping to Improve Argumentation Skills of PGSD Students. AL-TARBIYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan (The Educational Journal), 33(1): 85. https://doi.org/10.24235/ath.v33i1.13598.
Nasir, M., Budiarti, M., & Yandrefo, P. (2021). Arabic Debate Training to Improve Arabic Language Skills for Islamic University Students. BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(3): 700–706. https://doi.org/10.31949/jb.v2i3.1191.
Sholikhah, M., Syahab, F., & Eriyanti, R. N. (2022). Online-Based English Parliament Debate Training to Improve Critical Thinking and Argumentation Skills of Students. GERVASI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(1): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.31571/gervasi.v6i1.3479.
Syafitri, E., Armanto, D., & Rahmadani, E. (2021). Axiology of Critical Thinking Skills (A Study on the Benefits of Critical Thinking Skills). Journal of Science and Social Research, 4(3): 320. https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v4i3.682.
Zulaikha, F. I., & Setyowati, S. (2021). Training for Developing Critical Thinking Skills through English Debate Techniques for High School English Teachers in Ciamis Regency. E- Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 12(2): 236–241. https://doi.org/10.26877/e- dimas.v12i2.5509.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in JIMK journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
