ISLAMIC ENLIGHTENMENT IN PRINCIPLE AND PRACTICE: DIVINE SOVEREIGNTY AND HUMAN GOVERNANCE (التنوير الإسلامي تأصيلاً وتطبيقاً: مقدمة في سيادة الشرع وحوكمة البشر)

Jamal H. Al-Homsi


Despite researchers’ interests in studying Divine Sovereignty and its link to democracy since the last quarter of the 20th century, this Islamic principle still need more clarification, particularly in view of rising Islamophobia and fear from political Islam since early 21th century. This research aims at reviewing and re-interpreting the Sovereignty (al-Hakimiyah) principle as well as defending its proper interpretation against critics. It aims also at uncovering its significance in steering meta-public policy within an integrated perspective that does not ignore the role of Shura, wisdom and good governance. To remove any theocratic shadow or bad man-made implementation of the Sovereignty principle, this research coined a more core, clear and representative term: Islamic Enlightenment (IE) as a high-level objective of Shari‘a. The new term emphasizes knowledge and mercy aspects of Shari‘a instead of pure politics and authority of al-Hakimiyah. The IE means the ability of Shari‘a to provide guidance to humanity (identifying ultimate good and bad, right and wrong) at both the individual and society levels, without impairing mankind delegated authority in legislation. This research also explores the normative link between Shari‘a and state, making the IE a substantial opportunity rather than a political challenge, particularly in reaching objective common good. This is critically significant in view of the deep Western moral skepticism as embodied in the so-called naturalistic fallacy and Hume's law in moral philosophy. The research adopts a multidisciplinary approach that combines modern Islamic studies with ethical and political theory, history and public policy analysis, based on a synthesis of different components of the topic. Finally, the research proposes a set of conclusions and recommendations, of which a key recommendation for future research to formulate a high-level Islamic normative theory of public governance and wisdom with directing principles and institutional applications. This is necessary to guarantee the successful execution of the divine IE through a fallible man-made praxis.

Full Text:



Ahmed, S. (2016) What is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

Aijaz‏, I. (2017) Islam: A Contemporary Philosophical Investigation, Routledge.

An-Na’im, A. (2008) Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Sharia. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Beed, C. and Cara Beed (2000) Is the Case for Social Science Laws Strengthening? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Vol 30, Issue 2.

Cook, B. (2015) Hume’s Guillotine and Evolutionary Ethics: Evaluating Attempts to Overcome the Naturalistic Fallacy. Answers Research Journal 8 (2015):1–11.

Dolan, E. (1980) Basic Microeconomics. Second Edition. Dryden Press.

Domingo, R. (2016). Religion as a Constitutional Limit of the Secular Legal System. In: God and the Secular Legal System (Law and Christianity, pp. 73-121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feldman, N. (2008) The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.

Fukuyama, F. (2002) Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Farrar, Straus And Giroux: New York.

Fukuyama, F. (2013) What is Governance? Center for Global Development, Working Paper 314.

Hallaq, Wael (2007) What is Sharia? Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law, 2006-2005 , Vol. 12, No.1.

Harris, S. (2010) The Moral Landscape: How Science can Determine Human Values. Free Press.

Kazemi, F. (2001) Perspectives on Islam and Civil Society In: Sohail Hashmi, ed., Islamic Political Ethics: Civil Society, Pluralism and Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kelsay, J. (2002) Civil Society & Governance in Islam In: Sohail Hashmi, ed., Islamic Political Ethics: Civil Society, Pluralism and Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lapidus, I. (1996) State and Religion in Islamic Societies. Past and Present 151 (May): 3–27. /

Laws, E. & Leftwich, A. (2012) Bringing History Back In: Three Big Books: Summaries and some questions. DLP Background Paper 09. Birmingham: DLP.

Lee, K. (1985) A New Basis for Moral Philosophy (International Library of Philosophy Series), Routledge & Kegan Paul.

MacIntyre, A. (1988) Whose Justice? What Rationality? Notre Dame, Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Masud, K. (2002) The Scope of Pluralism in Islamic Moral Traditions In: Sohail Hashmi, ed., Islamic Political Ethics: Civil Society, Pluralism and Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Moore, G. E. (1903) Principia Ethica, ed. Thomas Baldwin (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993), pp. 61–62.

Pojman, L. and Fieser, J. (2012) Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong, 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Roy, O. (1995) The Failure of Political Islam. Translated by Carol Volk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Roy, S. (1989) Philosophy of Economics: On the Scope of Reason in Economic Inquiry. London: Routledge.

Sim, S. (ed.) (2001) The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism. Routledge: London.

Sinclair, N. (Ed.). (2018). The Naturalistic Fallacy (Classic Philosophical Arguments). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zaman, M. (2015) The Sovereignty of God in Modern Islamic Thought, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 25.3.


  • There are currently no refbacks.