ANTAGONISM ON ROHINGYA IN YOUTUBE COMMENTS: VIRTUAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF INDONESIA-MALAYSIA NETIZEN

Authors

  • Aditya Fahmi Nurwahid Department of Communication Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 60213 Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Anam Miftakhul Huda Department of Communication Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 60213 Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Ade Firmannandya Department of Communication Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 60213 Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Tsuroyya Department of Communication Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 60213 Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Mahesa Miarta Department of Communication Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 60213 Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Adibah Ismail College of Arts and Science, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2025.8.SI1.802

Abstract

This study explores antagonism in YouTube comments responding to news coverage of protests against Rohingya refugees in Indonesia and Malaysia. Drawing on a mixed-methods approach, the research combines sentiment analysis, qualitative content analysis, and topic modeling to examine 7428 comments from 7012 user accounts collected between November and December 2023. Using sentiment and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), this paper identifies dominant themes across comment sections of major media channels. The analysis reveals that commenters predominantly express out-group perspectives through repetitive, capitalized, and derogatory language, often forming bullying or dehumanizing voices. Performative hostility, marked by superlatives and emotive exaggeration, reinforces collective rejection and group identity. The discourse positioned Rohingya refugees as threats for the people in Indonesia and Malaysia, reflecting broader patterns of digital othering and exclusion. Notably, netizens focus more on critiquing refugee presence than evaluating government policy. This study underscores how digital platforms facilitate antagonistic discourse that marginalizes vulnerable groups. These insights underscore the urgent need for digital literacy initiatives and policy interventions to counteract online hostility and promote inclusive public discourse.

 

Keywords: Antagonism; YouTube Comments; Rohingya Refugees; Sentiment Analysis; Qualitative Content Analysis

References

Adhaniah, N., Heryadi, D., & Sari, D. S. (2021). The cooperation of UNHCR and Indonesia on Afghan refugee handling in Indonesia. Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS), 10(1), 51–65.

Albanese, F. (2020). Palestinian refugees in South East Asia: New frontiers of a 70-year exile. The Palestine Yearbook of International Law Online, 20(1), 3–32.

AlSumait, L., Barbará, D., Gentle, J., & Domeniconi, C. (2009). Topic significance ranking of LDA generative models. In W. Buntine, M. Grobelnik, D. Mladenić, & J. Shawe-Taylor (Eds.), Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases (Vol. 5781, pp. 67–82). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04180-8_22

Androutsopoulos, J., & Tereick, J. (2015). YouTube: Language and discourse practices in participatory culture. In The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 354–370). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315694344-29&type=chapterpdf

Bano, H., Akbar, W., Aslam, N., & Bilal, M. (2023). Identification and classification of extremist by topic modeling sentiment analysis. VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering, 11(2), 235–248.

Bishop, S. (2018). Anxiety, panic and self-optimization: Inequalities and the YouTube algorithm. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 24(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736978

Bodrunova, S. S., Litvinenko, A., Blekanov, I., & Nepiyushchikh, D. (2021). Constructive aggression? Multiple roles of aggressive content in political discourse on Russian YouTube. Media and Communication, 9, 181–194.

Böhme, C. (2021). Refugee 2.0: (De) constructing race, ethnicity, and identity through digital practices in refugees in camp settings and in-between places. In Critical pedagogy, race, and media (pp. 69–90). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003222835-6/refugee-2-0-claudia-b%C3%B6hme

Boomgaarden, H. G., & Vliegenthart, R. (2009). How news content influences anti‐immigration attitudes: Germany, 1993–2005. European Journal of Political Research, 48(4), 516–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01831.x

Boswell, C., Smellie, S., Maneri, M., Pogliano, A., Garcés-Mascareñas, B., Benet-Martínez, V., & Güell, B. (2021). The emergence, uses and impacts of narratives on migration: State of the art. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/the-emergence-uses-and-impacts-of-narratives-on-migration-state-o

Breazu, P., & Machin, D. (2023). Racism is not just hate speech: Ethnonationalist victimhood in YouTube comments about the Roma during Covid-19. Language in Society, 52(3), 511–531.

Brunner, M. M. (2022). The European far right: A review of the recent literature. Moving the Social, 67, 125–136.

Culloty, E., & Suiter, J. (2021). How online disinformation and far-right activism is shaping public debates on immigration. In Research handbook on international migration and digital technology (pp. 316–329). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781839100611/book-part-9781839100611-34.xml

Daniels, J. (2018). The algorithmic rise of the “Alt-Right.” Contexts, 17(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504218766547

De Blasio, E., Rega, R., & Valente, M. (2022). Polarization and platformization of news in Italian journalism: The coverage of migrant worker regularization. In Contemporary politics, communication, and the impact on democracy (pp. 74–92). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/polarization-and-platformization-of-news-in-italian-journalism/292683

de Rosa, A. S., Bocci, E., Salvati, M., Latini, M., Bonito, M., Carpignano, N., Nubola, A., Palombi, T., & Tovo, G. (2020). Transversal polarised discourse about “immigration” through multiple social media: Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube. INTED2020 Proceedings, 3257–3267. https://library.iated.org/view/DEROSA2020TRA

Earl, J., & Garrett, R. K. (2020). The new information frontier: Toward a more nuanced view of social movement communication. In Technology, media and social movements (pp. 97–111). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429428937-7/new-information-frontier-toward-nuanced-view-social-movement-communication-jennifer-earl-kelly-garrett

Ekman, M. (2019). Anti-immigrant sentiments and mobilization on the internet. In Sage handbook of media and migration (pp. 551–562).

Ekman, M. (2022). The great replacement: Strategic mainstreaming of far-right conspiracy claims. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 28(4), 1127–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221091983

Ergin, D. A., Akgül, G., & Karaman, N. G. (2021). Ethnic-based cyberbullying: The role of adolescents’ and their peers’ attitudes towards immigrants. Turkish Journal of Education, 10(2), 139–156.

Faisal, M. M. (2020). The Rohingya refugee crisis of Myanmar: A history of persecution and human rights violations. International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research, 7(3), 743–761.

Flores, L. A. (2020). Deportable and disposable: Public rhetoric and the making of the “illegal” immigrant. Penn State Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=AGsZEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=immigrant,+narratives+are+not+only+pervasive+but+also+persistent&ots=juXaCtuxbx&sig=b8mGA6t68c_rQW2Lua3h4EezKQw

Foxe, J. (2020). Fluid publics: The public-making power of hashtags in digital public spaces. Babel Unbound. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Indra-De-Lanerolle/publication/341091246_Fluid_Publics_The_public-making_power_of_hashtags_in_digital_public_spaces/links/6491b36bc41fb852dd1b117e/Fluid-Publics-The-public-making-power-of-hashtags-in-digital-public-spaces.pdf

Haron, A. S., Saidin, M. I. S., & Othman, Z. (2023). The human (in)security of Syrian refugees in Malaysia. Social Sciences, 12(6), 317.

Hart, H. (n.d.). Posts in category: Extremism & radicalisation. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from https://www.populismstudies.org/category/programs/extremism-radicalisation/page/2/

Humprecht, E., Hellmueller, L., & Lischka, J. A. (2020). Hostile emotions in news comments: A cross-national analysis of Facebook discussions. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 205630512091248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120912481

Inwood, O., & Zappavigna, M. (2023). Conspiracy theories and white supremacy on YouTube: Exploring affiliation and legitimation strategies in YouTube comments. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 20563051221150410. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221150410

Jackson, M. (2002). The politics of storytelling: Violence, transgression, and intersubjectivity (Vol. 3). Museum Tusculanum Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=OD-NIBnsGtMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA9&dq=process+of+Othering+aligns+with+the+theories+of+intergroup+conflict+and+symbolic+politics+where+refugees+are+viewed+as+an+undeserving+other,+importing+moral+and+physical+contaminants+&ots=tfY1qtOJ7B&sig=ls9w42u51Kdzq7doKW1LF1VxiVA

Jordan, B. (2021). Immigration, social cohesion and political reaction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52708-2

Kelling, C., & Monroe, B. L. (2023). Analysing community reaction to refugees through text analysis of social media data. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(2), 492–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2100551

Keulenaar, D., & Constanza, A. (2020). “The masked other”: A comparative study on the representation of immigrants in Fox News during the Obama and Trump administration [Master’s thesis, ISCTE-IUL]. https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/20728/1/Master_Anna_Constanza_Keulenaar.pdf

Khairi, A., Zainal, S., Tjoetra, A., & Wahab, A. A. (2024). From the sea to the land: Navigating the ambiguity of Rohingya refugees boat people in Malaysia and Indonesia. Proceedings of International Conference on Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities (ICoSPOLHUM), 4, 00024–00024. https://proceedings.unimal.ac.id/icospolhum/article/view/397

Kinariwala, S., & Deshmukh, S. (2023). Short text topic modelling using local and global word-context semantic correlation. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(17), 26411–26433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-14352-x

Kolhatkar, V., Wu, H., Cavasso, L., Francis, E., Shukla, K., & Taboada, M. (2020). The SFU opinion and comments corpus: A corpus for the analysis of online news comments. Corpus Pragmatics, 4(2), 155–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00065-w

Lange, P. G. (2007). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 361–380.

Marcks, H., & Pawelz, J. (2022). From myths of victimhood to fantasies of violence: How far-right narratives of imperilment work. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(7), 1415–1432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2020.1788544

Minkenberg, M., & Végh, Z. (2023). Policy shifts: Radical right impact on policies regarding minority and asylum issues. In Depleting democracies (pp. 126–169). Manchester University Press. https://www.manchesterhive.com/abstract/9781526160195/9781526160195.00011.xml

Missbach, A., & Stange, G. (2021). Muslim solidarity and the lack of effective protection for Rohingya refugees in Southeast Asia. Social Sciences, 10(5), 166.

Morgül, K. (2024). Beyond the inclusion–exclusion dichotomy in populism studies: Erdoğan’s Muslim nationalist discourse on Syrian refugees. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 12(1), 138–168. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-022-00175-0

Murshed, B. A. H., Abawajy, J., Mallappa, S., Saif, M. A. N., Al-Ghuribi, S. M., & Ghanem, F. A. (2022). Enhancing big social media data quality for use in short-text topic modeling. IEEE Access, 10, 105328–105351.

Murthy, D., & Sharma, S. (2019). Visualizing YouTube’s comment space: Online hostility as a networked phenomena. New Media & Society, 21(1), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818792393

Naab, T. K., Heinbach, D., Ziegele, M., & Grasberger, M.-T. (2020). Comments and credibility: How critical user comments decrease perceived news article credibility. Journalism Studies, 21(6), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1724181

Narasi TV. (2024). Membongkar jejaring buzzer penebar kebencian Rohingya (Buka Mata) [Investigative journalism]. Narasi TV. https://narasi.tv/video/buka-mata/membongkar-jejaring-buzzer-penebar-kebencian-rohingya

Onan, A., Korukoglu, S., & Bulut, H. (2016). LDA-based topic modelling in text sentiment classification: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications, 7(1), 101–119.

Osmani, A., Mohasefi, J. B., & Gharehchopogh, F. S. (2020). Enriched latent Dirichlet allocation for sentiment analysis. Expert Systems, 37(4), e12527. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12527

Pearce, S. C., & Rodgers, J. (2020). Social media as public journalism? Protest reporting in the digital era. Sociology Compass, 14(12), e12823. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12823

Peucker, M., & Spaaij, R. (2024). Alternative epistemology in far-right anti-publics: A qualitative study of Australian activists. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 37(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-023-09456-z

Putra, S. J., Aziz, M. A., & Gunawan, M. N. (2021). Topic analysis of Indonesian comment text using the latent Dirichlet allocation. In 2021 9th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9588870/?casa_token=1wqNaneEjBMAAAAA:GW5X0h8pzyww7G5maWXx0G6gOBP65Zu45mxIgLAjQLSDwujl7Chqe5spsvm7zllLJjgiqm4_0CJwNYI

Rosa, H. (2022). Social media filters and resonances: Democracy and the contemporary public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221103520

Salminen, J., Hopf, M., Chowdhury, S. A., Jung, S., Almerekhi, H., & Jansen, B. J. (2020). Developing an online hate classifier for multiple social media platforms. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-019-0205-6

Sanseverino, G. G. (2023). Politics and ethics of user generated content: A cross-national investigation of engagement and participation in the online news ecosystem in 80 news sites [PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier–Toulouse III]. https://theses.hal.science/tel-04449432/

Selvarajah, S., Kenar, N., Shaw, I. S., & Dhakal, P. (2024). Xenophobic portrayal of immigrants and refugees and threat image construction in the media: An introduction. In Xenophobia in the Media (1st ed., pp. 1–10). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003431855-1/xenophobic-portrayal-immigrants-refugees-threat-image-construction-media-senthan-selvarajah-nesrin-kenar-ibrahim-seaga-shaw-pradeep-dhakal

Sievert, C., & Shirley, K. (2014). LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces (pp. 63–70). https://aclanthology.org/W14-3110.pdf

Smith, C. Q., & Williams, S. G. (2021). Why Indonesia adopted ‘quiet diplomacy’ over R2P in the Rohingya crisis: The roles of Islamic humanitarianism, civil–military relations, and ASEAN. Global Responsibility to Protect, 13(2–3), 158–185.

Snyder, R. M. (2015). An introduction to topic modeling as an unsupervised machine learning way to organize text information. Association Supporting Computer Users in Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571275

Soral, W., Liu, J., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Media of contempt: Social media consumption predicts normative acceptance of anti-Muslim hate speech and Islamoprejudice. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 14, 1–13.

Štětka, V., & Mihelj, S. (2024). The illiberal public sphere: Media in polarized societies. Springer Nature. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/90888

Sultoni, Y., & Efendi, K. (2020). The existence of refugees and immigrants from Middle East in Southeast Asia. UMRAN – International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 7, 77–86.

Syahrin, M. A., Qalandy, M. R., & Jafizhan, M. S. (2024). In search of durable solutions for refugees in Indonesia: A state security and human rights protection approach. The Age of Human Rights Journal, 22. https://revistaselectronicas.ujaen.es/index.php/TAHRJ/article/view/8255

Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2018). Targeting dominant publics: How counterpublic commenters align their efforts with mainstream news. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2011–2027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712085

Urso, O. (2018). The politicization of immigration in Italy: Who frames the issue, when and how. Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 48(3), 365–381.

Vieten, U. M., & Poynting, S. (2022). The normalization of the racist far-right as global phenomenon. In Normalization of the Global Far Right: Pandemic Disruption? (pp. 1–10). Emerald Publishing. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/978-1-83909-956-420221001/full/html

Walsh, J. P. (2023). Digital nativism: Twitter, migration discourse and the 2019 election. New Media & Society, 25(10), 2618–2643. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211032980

Watson, B. R., & Riffe, D. (2013). Perceived threat, immigration policy support, and media coverage: Hostile media and presumed influence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 459–479.

Zarkesh, N., Baranovich, D. L., & Shoup, R. C. (2017). Social adaptation of Afghan refugees in Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters, 23(3), 2109–2111.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-07

How to Cite

ANTAGONISM ON ROHINGYA IN YOUTUBE COMMENTS: VIRTUAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF INDONESIA-MALAYSIA NETIZEN. (2025). Asian People Journal (APJ), 8(SI1), 92-109. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2025.8.SI1.802