INTEGRATING SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY INTO ESL WRITING PEDAGOGY: A STUDY OF LEARNERS’ STRATEGIES AND PERCEPTIONS

Authors

  • Zulaikha Khairuddin Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Malaysia
  • Khairunnisa Mohd Daud Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Malaysia
  • Nurul Atiqah Amran Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia
  • Salina Sabri Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Malaysia
  • Noor Hanim Rahmat Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2025.8.2.822

Abstract

Abstract: Writing skill, a vital aspect of literacy, often pose challenges for ESL students. The complexity of the structure of an essay, as well as ESL students’ level of proficiency, are some of the problems faced by these learners which can hinder their writing performance. As such, this study investigates ESL students’ perceptions on the writing strategies used when writing academic essays, with a focus on how cognitive, behavioural, and environmental factors interact to shape writing performance. Drawing on Bandura’s triadic reciprocal determinism, this quantitative study aims to explore the relationship between the personal, behaviour and environment components. To gain a better understanding of their perceptions, a survey was conducted to 142 students in a local higher learning institution in Malaysia. The survey used a 5 likert-scale survey and analysis was conducted using SPSS. Findings showed that these students employed all five (5) writing strategies, i.e., metacognitive, effort regulation, cognitive, social, and affective strategies. Findings of this study also suggested that by integrating SCT principles into writing pedagogy not only enhances strategy awareness but also promotes learner autonomy and resilience. Correlation analysis further revealed a highly significant association between personal components and behaviour (r = .718**, p = .000), indicating a strong positive relationship between these variables. It was also found that there are significant correlations among the three constructs personal, behaviour and environment) discussed. This suggested that educators should consider the three constructs in assisting students to write better. The study concludes with pedagogical recommendations and directions for future research into SCT-informed writing interventions.

Keywords: Affective Strategies; Cognitive Strategies; Effort Regulation Strategies; Metacognitive Strategies; Social Cognitive Theory; Social Strategies

References

Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International, 2023(1), 4253331.

Azmar, K., & Razali, A. B. (2024). Teaching and learning English academic writing in Malaysian tertiary context. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 49–56.

Baharudin, F., Ramli, N. L., Habali, A. M., Azmi, A. A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). Process of writing: The challenges in writing skill among ESL learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(10), 33–52.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 349–373). Sage Publications Ltd.

Cheung, Y. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Jang, H. (2021). Impact of a socio-cognitive approach to teaching English language writing on primary school students’ compositions. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 1–22.

Feng Teng, M. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT for English as a foreign language writing: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3).

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.

Hapsari, M. D. H., Fatimah, N., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2024). Students’ strategies in learning writing online: A case at English Education Department. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 3(2), 111–122.

Hasan, N. R. H. (2025). Learners’ challenges and problems in English writing skill: A study on students at King Faisal University.

International Journal for Scientific Research, 4(2), 123–140.

Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Maarof, N., & Murat, M. (2013). Writing strategies used by ESL upper secondary school students. International Education Studies, 6(4), 47–55.

Mohamad Marzaini, A. F., Shahazwan, M. Y., Noorhayati, Z., Mohamad, H. B., Wan Nurul Elia, H. S., & Supramaniam, K. (2024). A discovery on Malaysian ESL teachers’ adherence to policy mandates in classroom-based assessment practices. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 249–284.

Mu, C., & Carrington, S. (2007). An investigation of three Chinese students' English writing strategies. TESL-EJ: The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 11(1), 1–23.

Nggawu, L., Husain, D. L., Agustina, S., & Yasin, Y. (2022). The effectiveness of collaborative writing strategy in improving essay writing skills of university students in the EFL context. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 5731–5743.

Nguyen, T. N. (2023). A study on writing strategies used by students of different levels of proficiency at a university in Vietnam. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(5), 2722–2729.

Nhung, N. (2023). A study on writing strategies used by students of different levels of proficiency at a university in Vietnam. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(5), 2722–2729.

Nurfaidah, S. (2018). Vygotsky’s legacy on teaching and learning writing as a social process. Langkawi: Journal of the Association for Arabic and English, 4(2), 149–156.

Pang, Y., Hashim, H., & Said, N. E. M. (2024). Exploration on the use of learning strategies in writing for English major students. Nurture, 18(4), 816–830.

Paudel, J. (2022). Demystifying writing: Strategies for developing better writing. Journal of NELTA, 27(1–2), 181–200.

Prasadini, N. N., Brilianti, A. E., Ramadhanti, S. F., & Efridiani, R. (2023). Unveiling the challenges of academic writing: Perspectives from students and lecturers. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Linguistics and Language Teaching (pp. 67–74).

Rahmat, N. H. (2020). Thinking about thinking in writing. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 3(4), 20–37.

Rakrak, M. (2025). Evolving perspectives on the process approach to writing: From stage models to cognitive models. International Journal of Advanced Academic Studies, 7(2), 8–13.

Raoofi, S., Miri, A., Gharibi, J., & Malaki, B. (2017). Assessing and validating a writing strategy scale for undergraduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 624–633.

Sagredo-Ortiz, S., & Kloss, S. (2025, May). Academic writing strategies in university students from three disciplinary areas: Design and validation of an instrument. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1600497.

Sasaki, M. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54(3), 525–582.

Sehlström, P., Waldmann, C., & Levlin, M. (2023). Self-efficacy for writing and written text quality of upper secondary students with and without reading difficulties. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1231817.

Sethuraman, M., & Radhakrishnan, G. (2020). Promoting cognitive strategies in second language writing. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(88), 105–120.

Song, Y., Bao, H., & Shen, S. (2022). Understanding the influence of initial values of college students in shaping pro-environmental behavioral intention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9730.

Suvin, S. (2020). Complexities of writing skill at the secondary level in Bangladesh education system: A quantitative case study analysis. English Language Teaching, 13(12), 65–75.

Teng, M. F., Wang, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Assessing self-regulatory writing strategies and their predictive effects on young EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 51, 100573.

Victori, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223–234.

Zakaria, N., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2024). The needs analysis of ESL learners’ expository writing challenges: Perspectives of ESL teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(5), 322–335.

Zakaria, Z., Amirul Izzat, S. A. R., & Mohamed, A. M. D. (2024). Assessment in action: Investigating the practices of Malaysian physical and health education teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 2187–2204.

Zhang, H., Xu, X., Lei, V. N. L., Hong, W. C. H., & Jie, W. (2025). Academic writing challenges and supports for early-stage Chinese postgraduates: A mixed-methods study on teaching-research integration, supervisor engagement, and self-efficacy. PLOS ONE, 20(2), e0317470.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In Handbook of academic learning (pp. 105–125). Academic Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31 — Updated on 2025-11-01

Versions

How to Cite

INTEGRATING SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY INTO ESL WRITING PEDAGOGY: A STUDY OF LEARNERS’ STRATEGIES AND PERCEPTIONS. (2025). Asian People Journal (APJ), 8(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2025.8.2.822 (Original work published 2025)